Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 212 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science



Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Current Poll Results

Are you an inventor of a FE/OU generator device?

Yes; it works; I'm ready for testing (comment)10 %10 %10 % 10.70% (20)
Yes; it works; not ready for testing5 %5 %5 % 5.35% (10)
Yes; no working prototype yet19 %19 %19 % 19.79% (37)
No64 %64 %64 % 64.17% (120)

Total Votes: 187

[ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

 What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (78 votes)

 What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

 Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (144 votes)

 The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (103 votes)

 If you could support just one of them, which one would it be? (216 votes)

"Are you an inventor of a FE/OU generator device?" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Are you an inventor of a FE/OU generator device? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Tuesday, October 03, 2006 @ 23:44:48 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com

As suggested in the survey’s pane and in the “heads-up” text in our special announcement section, only for those of you who are inventors and have a working device that you are ready (and willing) to properly validate (test), I am asking you to give us some more information about you and your device through a comment attached to this survey. Click on “Post Comment” button from the “Results” view – this one where you are now, reading this message. You have to login to post comments but if you don’t have an account and don’t want to create one, please login with the username “guest” and password “guest” to get access to post comments.

Nobody is expecting detailed or any private/confidential/proprietary information about yourself and your device, but certainly, only a click on the top radio button would not be considered sufficient to take your vote seriously. All the votes that would be counted in this category would have to have an associated comment. General statements such as what country (city eventually) are you from, what type of device you have (electro-static/magnetic/chemical, plasma, rotating or solid state, etc.), output net power (W), calculated/estimated COP, stable operation or not, size (is it transportable?), are you willing to have it tested using an agreed upon protocol, and any other information you feel like sharing with the general public for now.

I was always of the opinion that the most important (and probably the only one) thing that would finally open a new era of amazing progress in the energy research field and a new chapter in human evolution towards a better socio-political, economical and environmentally responsible world, would be the first widely accepted demonstration of a FE (call it fuel-less energy) device, such as what STEORN is trying to accomplish now. We should consider the generated buzz around the STEORN challenge an opportunity to squeeze much greater technological accomplishments through “the cracks” opened by the Irish company into the scientific (and the general public) ignorance of the subject.

We’ll announce soon a very interesting proposal to do exactly that for the few legitimate FE community inventors willing to help us break the icy-indifference of the narrow-minded skepticism, and this survey is part of the problem assessment to see what are we dealing with here.

Thank you for your understanding and support,


Re: Are you an inventor of a FE/OU generator device? (Score: 1)
by nikes on Saturday, November 18, 2006 @ 21:51:40 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)

Yes, I am an inventor of the FE generator.
I am working on this topic over 15 years. In the past years I did my best to build and test concept proof  prototype of one of my inventions. It shown 90% efficiency (with very limited budget that i had. I have invested 3000 USD into building). After that I have invested another 4000 USD of my money and did my best to built next device. Due to limited funds, I had no chance to make a proper R&D of the shieding materials and this is why the machine did not reach overunity again. However, it did shown that I am on a right path (experimental data clearly confirmed my concept is right).
To distinquish my device from others I call it Zero Inductive Reactance generator (because of the main feature it posesses). In any electro-generating device up to 98% of the input energy is spent to overcome this particular force. In my ZIR generator there is no iductive reactance, so the  only force to overcome to generate electricity is mechanical friction inside the system (which is always constant no matter how big is energy output).

Right now, I need about 15-20K USD to finish a proper shielding R&D and another 30-40K USD to build and test a prototype. I am open for any suggestions and will be glad to hear any advise.

Re: Are you an inventor of a FE/OU generator device? (Score: 1)
by Koen on Friday, December 08, 2006 @ 07:14:20 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla

Not yet. The FE movement is like a jungle of mostly sincere seekers for OU, (paid) hoaxers, and maybe a working device.
First I wanted to know a principle of "FE", and analysed many scientific papers and websites. Nothing seemed to be of direct practicle use. Then, by coincidence together with Andre Waser, I discovered a new theory/principle that explained something about using static electricity for energy conversion.

It is simply  P =  Q dV/dt ,  where Q is the amount of static charge, and dV/dt is the change in voltage per second. P is power in watt.  Just move the  dt  operator to 'Q',  and you get  P = dQ/dt V = IV  and this is the well known expression for electric power. So   P = Q dV/dt  has unit 'watt' as well.

The challenge is to create a huge change of volt per second with as little energy loss as possible, and to confront as much static charge Q with the rapid changing voltage. I think this is what Ed Gray was doing, also Tesla and Baumann (Testatika). This is what I want to try, and feed back the (extra?) energy to a battery or so. I can use (for instance) a high voltage switch and a static charge generator (maybe a large metal surface is sufficient).

P = Q dV/dt  is also related to longitudinal electric waves. Is the ZPE energy really a background field of electromagnetic waves (as suggested by dr. Puthoff  and others), or do we also have a ZPE field of Tesla's longitudinal electric waves?  If so, then static charge is simply 'ordering' these ZPE longitudinal background waves into a noticeable electric field.
Then tapping the ZPE has nothing to do with dynamic currents; it is a matter of understanding static charge and the electric field.

Every FE researcher should do something different and creative: do your own thing!


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.