ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 145 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry
American Antigravity
Closeminded Science
EarthTech
ECW E-Cat World
Innoplaza
Integrity Research Institute
New Energy Movement
New Energy Times
Panacea-BOCAF
RexResearch
Science Hobbyist
T. Bearden Mirror Site
USPTO
Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Current Poll Results

Do we know what ENERGY really is?

Yes (change or the potential for change)22 %22 %22 % 22.93% (47)
No (we define it by itself - capacity to do work)55 %55 %55 % 55.61% (114)
I'm not sure.21 %21 %21 % 21.46% (44)

Total Votes: 205


[ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

 To break-through, an OU device needs an acceptable theory. (138 votes)

 What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (79 votes)

 What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

 Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (144 votes)

 The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (103 votes)


"Do we know what ENERGY really is?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Do we know what ENERGY really is? (Score: 1)
by med8bux (med8bux@yahoo.com) on Friday, September 02, 2005 @ 10:15:42 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)

Without change, or it's potential there is no need for energy. Our problem is not whether or not we know what energy is.
Our problem is whether or not we should use energy responsibly, aiming first towards passive energy returns, then conservation, then pleasure based only on the excess in supply, not over demanding what little we have, without a plan to renew that which we have the ability to store.
Then we have ZPE that makes the second half of the paragraph mute. ; )


Re: Do we know what ENERGY really is? (Score: 1)
by DanielJackson (SG1Dan@AOl.COM) on Sunday, November 27, 2005 @ 22:59:50 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)

I quoted a line from an electronics text book in my SFG text that goes like this; "Energy is the accomplishment of a wave of motion, without the means of matter: even through vacuuos space."

Here we have a wave form definition. And now quantum mechanics defines energy as being made up of a basic particle of energy called a photon. Yet, even further they have divided it into units of "Quanta"

What ever it is, it also can exert a force without and mechanical help such as a motor, since static electricity can attract small bits of matter and hence move mass all of its own as I said without mechanical help.

In my years of electronics, adding in years as an amateur astronomer. I can not exactly define what energy is. It can merely be as a wave if thats how we look at it. Then it can be as a particle of mass. Yet, we can't really see or measure it from both vantages at once and that is a peculiar matter that has puzzled the Relativty crowd and the Quantum folk? (Though I think they have resolved this.) We can however measure it in certain ways, mostly by the force it exerts on mass or by how much it can heat mass. "Watts" is expended in heat to some extent, with so much going into the work being done. And that brings us to efficiency, how much is expended in losses as compared to that portion effectively used to accomplish a certain rate of work?

I do however like my electronics definition for energy, it has a peculiar view all of its own.

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.