ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 157 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry
American Antigravity
Closeminded Science
EarthTech
ECW E-Cat World
Innoplaza
Integrity Research Institute
New Energy Movement
New Energy Times
Panacea-BOCAF
RexResearch
Science Hobbyist
T. Bearden Mirror Site
USPTO
Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Current Poll Results

Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?

yes64 %64 %64 % 64.81% (35)
no35 %35 %35 % 35.19% (19)

Total Votes: 54


[ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

[ Go Back ]

Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

 To break-through, an OU device needs an acceptable theory. (138 votes)

 What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (79 votes)

 What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

 Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (144 votes)

 The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (103 votes)


"Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 04:14:06 UTC

There is a significant difference between the research field into ZPE and the amateur experiments with supposed ZPE effects. My answer is based on those who are researching or theorising about ZPE.

I suspect that Karn was directing his usual narrow minded attack against the amateur experimentor. There is no doubt that this would attract a lot of scam merchants but no more so than a computer with an internet connection ! The problem is that the likes of Karn are so dismissive of ZPE possibilities that there will be a lot of highly respected people who avoid the subject for fear of ridicule (and their pay packets ). Yet, since NO-ONE actually fully understands the vacuum & gravity & inertia etc then clearly no possibilities can yet be honestly discounted.

Malcolm


Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 16:36:59 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)

The number of cranks, quacks, and downright frauds in this field comprises the majority of the fantastic claims being made daily by people trolling for funds from the uninformed. Scientifically the study of the structure of the vacuum is still a bonafide area of inquiry both in theory and experiment. Any new knowledge coming from this area could drastically affect our understanding of not only the vacuum, but the interactions that propagate through it.


Yes, but; and by the way Wow! (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 18:15:43 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com

Was this poll atteched to an article as a way of showing off? Very cool. Maybe I can get a poll about that ...

Certainly there is serious professional work on ZPE, and the people who are doing it are not confused by the quackery. And it can be said about almost *any* science these days that the layman is hard pressed to find accessible resources that are not filled with oversimplification, boosterism, hype, hyperbole, and sometimes even outright misconduct. The science journalists are part of the problem, but not all of it.

But QT is just an inaccessible topic and so it's more poisoned than most science journalism with new-age quackery, the ZP being about the worst.


 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.