Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 55 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 8, 2018 - August 12, 2018) COFE10 + TeslaTech Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science


    Energy Science



    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs


    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.




    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    Alternative Energy News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Current Poll Results

    Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?

    yes64 %64 %64 % 64.15% (34)
    no35 %35 %35 % 35.85% (19)

    Total Votes: 53

    [ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

    [ Go Back ]

    Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

     What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (78 votes)

     What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

     Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (143 votes)

     The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (102 votes)

     If you could support just one of them, which one would it be? (216 votes)

    "Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 04:14:06 EDT

    There is a significant difference between the research field into ZPE and the amateur experiments with supposed ZPE effects. My answer is based on those who are researching or theorising about ZPE.

    I suspect that Karn was directing his usual narrow minded attack against the amateur experimentor. There is no doubt that this would attract a lot of scam merchants but no more so than a computer with an internet connection ! The problem is that the likes of Karn are so dismissive of ZPE possibilities that there will be a lot of highly respected people who avoid the subject for fear of ridicule (and their pay packets ). Yet, since NO-ONE actually fully understands the vacuum & gravity & inertia etc then clearly no possibilities can yet be honestly discounted.


    Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 16:36:59 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    The number of cranks, quacks, and downright frauds in this field comprises the majority of the fantastic claims being made daily by people trolling for funds from the uninformed. Scientifically the study of the structure of the vacuum is still a bonafide area of inquiry both in theory and experiment. Any new knowledge coming from this area could drastically affect our understanding of not only the vacuum, but the interactions that propagate through it.

    Yes, but; and by the way Wow! (Score: 1)
    by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 18:15:43 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com

    Was this poll atteched to an article as a way of showing off? Very cool. Maybe I can get a poll about that ...

    Certainly there is serious professional work on ZPE, and the people who are doing it are not confused by the quackery. And it can be said about almost *any* science these days that the layman is hard pressed to find accessible resources that are not filled with oversimplification, boosterism, hype, hyperbole, and sometimes even outright misconduct. The science journalists are part of the problem, but not all of it.

    But QT is just an inaccessible topic and so it's more poisoned than most science journalism with new-age quackery, the ZP being about the worst.


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.