ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 170 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

Pilot-wave theory strikes back
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2016 @ 18:19:35 EDT by vlad

Science Anonymous writes: With few decades of delay the Pilot-wave theory  seems to be proven trues. A Team of physicists from Toronto, using the latest gentel probing techniques succeeded to prove the Pilot-Wave theory in the double slit experiment.

From Quanta Magazine: New Support for Alternative Quantum View

An experiment claims to have invalidated a decades-old criticism against pilot-wave theory, an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics that avoids the most baffling features of the subatomic universe.



Of the many counter intuitive features of quantum mechanics, perhaps the most challenging to our notions of common sense is that particles do not have locations until they are observed. This is exactly what the standard view of quantum mechanics, often called the Copenhagen interpretation, asks us to believe. Instead of the clear-cut positions and movements of Newtonian physics, we have a cloud of probabilities described by a mathematical structure known as a wave function. The wave function, meanwhile, evolves over time, its evolution governed by precise rules codified in something called the Schrödinger equation. The mathematics are clear enough; the actual whereabouts of particles, less so. Until a particle is observed, an act that causes the wave function to “collapse,” we can say nothing about its location. Albert Einstein, among others, objected to this idea. As his biographer Abraham Pais wrote: “We often discussed his notions on objective reality. I recall that during one walk Einstein suddenly stopped, turned to me and asked whether I really believed that the moon exists only when I look at it.”

Full article:


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Pilot-wave theory strikes back" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Pilot-wave theory strikes back (Score: 1)
by RBM on Monday, May 30, 2016 @ 11:25:53 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Hahaha this is a good laugh.

Humans abhor uncertainty and QM has lots of it due to it's probabilistic nature. That's also why QM is called counter-intuitive, because the perspective is a limited one from a philosophical materialist/physicalist perspective. Science isn't a straight line trajectory, so this media attention will not last long.





Re: Pilot-wave theory strikes back (Score: 1)
by profraccoon on Saturday, June 04, 2016 @ 03:15:34 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Modern physics (QM, SR/GR) was heavily influenced by Maxwell's totally inconsistent theory of electricity and magnetism. Maxwell's theory only describes vacuum field waves in the form of TEM waves with phase velocity equal to c.  The reason pilot waves were rejected by most physicists: these have to be superluminal, even hyperluminal, and such waves are not predicted. Also other aspects of the nature of pilot waves (in terms of classical electrodynamics) was not understood.

My theory of classical electrodynamics (electro-magnetism) is consistent, and it describes TEM waves as well as LEM waves (longitudinal electromagnetic) and superluminal Phi waves. Phi waves are also longitudinal electric waves, that only depend on the electric potential (Phi).

So the Bohm-DeBroglie pilot wave might be a superluminal Phi wave, and now we have for the first time in history a fully physical theory of De Broglie's 'particle-wave mechanics'.

The difference between Pilot wave theory and QM should be testable, it is not just a matter of 'taste' about the physical and "unphysical". So my suggestion is that the so called Pilot wave is a Phi wave (see my consistent CED theory) that can carry energy, momentum and information with superluminal speed.  The so called "non-locality" of QM wave functions does not allow for energy nor information transfer with superluminal speed.

I derived general power- and force theorems in the context of my GCED (general classical electrodynamics) theory, and TEM/LEM/Phi waves all carry energy and momentum.




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.