ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 130 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Gyroscopes rise upwards due to curled gravity
    Posted on Thursday, June 29, 2006 @ 19:05:56 GMT by vlad

    Science FDT writes: A hydrodynamical theory of gravity based exclusively on differentiating the velocity field vector once, with respect to time, can yield more information on magnetic force than appears in a modern textbook. The totally parallel hydrodynamical theories of gravity and electromagnetism leave us to choose whether,

    (1)A positron is a sink in one aether, and a source in the other aether, or

    (2) Whether there is only one aether, and that like charges only repel when they are positive.

    The latter conclusion is the same as saying that gravity and negative electricity are one and the same thing. This article on gyroscopic force,

    http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe5.pdf

    will carefully put forward arguments to suggest that gravity and negative electricity are both sinks in the same aether, and that there are three additional rotational components of gravity which are not included in Newton's law of gravitation, or Coulomb's law of electrostatics. The rising action of a gyroscope will be attributed to the fact that the aether gets curled when a spinning gyroscope is subjected to an applied torque at right angles to the axis of spin.

    In section VI of this article,

    http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe4.pdf

    it is conclusively proved that the Lorentz force (E=vXB), and the Coriolis force are mathematically identical. This again suggests that the gravitational aether and the electrostatic aether are the same thing.

    Yours sincerely, David Tombe


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 3
    Votes: 2


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Gyroscopes rise upwards due to curled gravity" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Conservation of Energy does not apply to the Rotational force of EM Induction (Score: 1)
    by FDT on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 @ 11:58:18 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    The above article talks about three additional rotational components to gravity. Two of these are the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force. These two should be more accurately referred to as convective components. They represent the effect of motion of a particle in the aether. The centrifugal force is strongly linked to kinetic energy and the ability of a particle to move against aether flow and escape from falling down a sink. The Coriolis force is concerned with the effect of the motion of a particle in a vortex.

    Neither of these two convective forces actually alter kinetic energy.

    It is the third of these three additional forces ∂A/∂t, where A is the aether field velocity, that should most accurately be described as a rotational force. Unlike the irrotational inverse square law component, this rotational component is not connected with any theory of conservation of energy.

    The irrotational component represents radial motion into a sink, or out of a source, and it is the basis of the law of conservation of mechanical energy. The rotational component represents the effect of aether vortex motion on a particle and it involves the transfer of energy. The rotational component must therefore be the main component involved in electromagnetic induction and in electromagnetic energy transfer.

    An electromagnetic wave must therefore constitute a propagation of rotations in a sea of vortices.

    Although the law of conservation of kinetic and potential energy does not apply to the rotational  ∂A/∂t force, Lenz's law still tells us that we will not be obtaining any perpetual motion.

    Yours sincerely, David Tombe



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.