ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 200 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

Current State of New Energy R&D (2)
T. Bearden's response to the NEM questionnaire




Dear Steve,

Instead of filling out the questionnaire constrained to a certain view, attached is a future article still in draft, that I will probably be putting on my website in finished form in the future.

The “energy from the vacuum” problem is strictly due to what was deliberately done to the electrical engineering model during its formation after Maxwell’s death.

Unfortunately, most persons in the “energy from the vacuum” area do not understand that the conventional EE model, by assuming a flat spacetime and an inert vacuum, and by describing only symmetrical systems, specifically prohibits the type systems the inventors are unknowingly trying to build.

We have to learn to build those deliberately discarded Maxwellian asymmetrical systems that Lorentz arbitrarily excluded.

I hope that the background of this problem and the specific “spelling it out” with necessary references will be of use to you and your New Energy Movement study.

It’s sad in a way. Simply lay a charged capacitor or electret on a permanent magnet, so that the E-field and B-field are orthogonal. Then by conventional Poynting EM energy flow theory, that silly thing will sit there and freely pour out real, usable EM energy – real observable photons – until the end of time if nothing disturbs or changes it.

So there is absolutely no problem in evoking a “free flow of usable real EM energy” – anywhere in the universe. Every EM system already does it, in its source dipolarity’s broken symmetry.

But by deliberately designing and building only symmetrical systems, our engineers have always been trained to only build systems that self-destroy their internal source of freely flowing energy from the vacuum, faster than they can power their loads with some of it.

Consequently, we continually have to pay to crank the shaft of the generator, just to continue to restore that source dipole – that we ourselves design all our power systems to continually destroy. A huge revolution in physics occurred with the prediction of broken symmetry by Lee and Yang (particularly in 1956) and its immediate experimental proof by Wu and her colleagues in Feb. 1957. So revolutionary was this discovery, that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded Lee and Yang the Nobel Prize the very same year, in Dec. 1957.

Yet in the 50 years since then, the revolutionary ramifications of broken symmetry have not made it across the university campus from the Physics Department to the Electrical Engineering Department.

That is the major “new energy” problem, still largely unrecognized even in the free energy movement itself.

Anyway, I hope you find the information of interest, and I also hope that the leadership of the New Energy Movement can come to grips with this problem, and perhaps influence the scientific community into correcting that sadly flawed old EE model. The known errors in it have long been pointed out by eminent scientists such as Nobelist Feynman and many others, but to no avail. A listing and small discussion of the major falsities are given in the paper at http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/CEM%20Errors%20-%20final%20paper%20complete%20w%20longer%20abstract4.doc . A National Science Foundation letter indicating their favorable formal review is at http://www.cheniere.org/references/NSF%20letter%20Bearden.jpg . Yet sadly, the folks at NSF that are in charge of the electrical power area, communications, etc. have no intention of changing and correcting that old 1880s CEM/EE model.

We really need the scientific community to fund some sharp young doctoral candidates, post doctoral scientists, and sharp physics/electrodynamics professors to thoroughly revise the standard EE model now so seriously flawed. Once they are aware that asymmetric Maxwellian systems are in Maxwell’s actual theory but have been deliberately discarded, the sharp ones will proceed to solve the “free energy” problem in a very short time, if simply permitted to work in the area without their careers being destroyed.

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden









Published on: 2007-07-21 (4143 reads)

[ Go Back ]

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.