Put a finger that rods have not taken away you.

[Coach]

[url]http: // www.ahnenerbe.org/Techno/HB1_small.jpg [/url]

http://www.ahnenerbe.org/Techno/Vril1.jpg

[url]http: // www.ahnenerbe.org/Techno/HB2_1.jpg [/url]


Imagine such situation:

People by turns approach to the identifier, put a finger, a palm, or by the other method are identified.
Then works the lock and one of doors opens.
Everyone enters into the opened door.

Now let's look, that is created behind each of them...

Behind one door people get (strictly definitely) to, directly, to the worker.
For another they are expected with information, analytical processing, trainings, simulators, a relaxation, training, health services and the other actions which have been not connected directly with performance of their labour activity.

As the certain rules personnel security which mean, properly, should be carried out:
- Absence of dialogue at the personnel among themselves in a life, on a workplace, and during transportation it.
- Indifference to circuits of performance of works.
- An opportunity of maintenance «certain ("determined"), strictly given a level of performance of works.

Actually, very briefly those minima of maintenance of works with power which installations of efficiency > 1, in my opinion, are listed.

At sufficient simplicity of technological execution of power which installations of efficiency > 1, for example VRIL, there are huge problems of their operation?
The basic from them are maintenance and correct maintenance entropy balance.
At modern power which installations of efficiency < 1 (10 - 15 %) problems of operation, basically (70 - 80 %), are connected with:
- Mistakes in management
- Constructional destruction
- Infringement of technologies

And only modern users "give" 5-10 % of refusals under destroying power and "not clear".

Well, for example, they already agree, is clean from statistical supervision, that the majority of aviation accidents (from these of 5-10 % of refusals) occurs because of:
- Presence more than one crew on one board
- Drop - out from existential " frequently used " a corridor (a start after a long delay)
- Replacement of the unit (directly ahead of accident)
- Change of crew (Sknyliv tragedy)

In general, on my approximate calculations, probability of refusal at power which installations of efficiency > 1, for example VRIL - 0.2 at, confidential probability of 30 %.
The lion's share, at such enough high probability of refusal (at departed 10 machines come back 8 ) lays on mistakes of mathematical model of operation, and at its absence at all the probability of refusal comes nearer to 0.5. It, besides, on mine opinion, use by III Reich of already constructed machines speaks not - each second crew together with the device disappeared. At such statistics of flights operation is equivalent « throwing of a coin », or game with including - switching off meat grinder. To pilots it is easier to structure to be shot...

To lower probability of refusal, even up to 0.001 as at modern flying (FD) devices, it is necessary to create essentially new architecture and creations FD, and its operation, that demands reorganization of the thinking, essentially new approach to the decision of problems of operation of power which installations of efficiency > 1.

And it destruction of the usual circuits of operation... (it is a thing heavy)

Now about cores
[url]http: // www.ufotheatre.com/rods/rods.htm [/url]

[url]http: // www.x-libri.ru/elib/smi01851/00000003.htm [/url]

Cores are created and intended for "gathering" the certain information, it is possible for its confirmation and fixing, at beforehand them known, gallop entropy.
How they find out about it?
Probably for rods it not a problem.
They collect and have any general information (enough full) to be in the necessary place in necessary time.

In this theme I try to discuss problems of operation of power installations from efficiencies > 1, to consider not closed circuits where energy acts from the outside.
At the majority of discussions of power installations from efficiencies > 1 there is an idea of creation, body solutions, I am excited more with operation.
Here I mention a theme of "cores" to emphasize vulnerability of crudity. If to compare cores to usual bees it is possible to assume, that they collect "pollen" from burst entropy which and have found. They do not provoke it, they simply collect it. All "accusations" of cores that at their presence people perish speak that we notice them only under these circumstances. The mankind does not investigate the space on a theme of scanning entropy. And they, just also are called to be engaged in it.