Search found 95 matches

Yes, master all these mathematics. They are tools with which I have gone further: http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/physics/na

Ultimately, I believe matter in its purest form is nothing more then a place where action/energy occurs. I believe it is, at its most fundimental, grass roots, a point in space. I agree with the ...

QArtist: I've given you an important question, actually, because I think dipoles are critical to everything. Put these in your plus/minus (what keys?) calculus! 'SAWA

Galaxies are clustered on such bubble walls in the large.

I have long championed the Albers yeasted-swisscheese theory. There should not be one of anything (QArtist: lo, Platonic roots!) so there should be an unending set of expanding regions and also contr ...

At this point I do see what you say, yes! Cosmologists will say there either is no outside, that there is not space in which this space is embedded, or that there are multiple bubbles, or something. ...

QuantumArtist: On your opening page you first say neutrals ignore each other. Then a paragraph or so later you seem to say the opposite. The first statement is true only in the electric sense and o ...

I think there is nothing so special about the local environment. We have spacecraft sailing among the outer planets and astronomy bringing us clues in many spectral regions about far space. We are m ...

I cannot understand your words.

What did he need to know?

I think he succeeded here. Electromagnetic energy has respectable Lorentz tranforms which is why a fast-moving particle is experienced as a flattened pancake. In the general theory of gravitation th ...

We are coming close to seeing the profound nature of massiveness in two seemingly disparate manifestations. First, anything "massive", which to me only means energy localized and not going away, gi ...

Good example, to see the physics removed from strong local fields. If the one-ton mass is approaching me because my pilot did not fire braking rockets sufficiently, I will be dead and you will have ...

If my numbers are correct, the one-ton mass will get a speed of 24 feet/sec, more than I estimated (about 14 miles/hr). The astronaut trying to snare the satellite would be smushed if the shuttle pil ...

No. Mass is not changed and you experience it inertially. Weight is relative to a non-accelerating frame of reference.


Create an account	Home · Topics · Downloads · Your Account · Submit News · Top 10


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.