ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 1392 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    "Was Dr. Steven Greer's announcement premature:" | Login/Create an Account | 13 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Shallow criticism (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, February 13, 2003 @ 12:04:54 UTC


    Unlike Eric, Dr. Greer is a well educated person. And, as Dr. Greer himself carefully, explicitly, and emphatically noted in his interview with George Noory, he is not a physicist, nor does he pretend to be. The scientific team at SEAS, on the other hand, ARE all physicists and electrical engineers.

    But even the preliminary analysis of this device at SEAS is not good enough for Dr. Greer, or for the world. The central issue at hand, as I have explained to you now more times than I can count, is the credibility and physics expertise of the labs (PLURAL) which will be independently testing this device.

    There are other very serious issues to be considered with regard to the credibility of the three different independent labs which will be testing this device. Firstly, as anyone who understands intellectual property rights law can readily appreciate, SEAS has entered a non disclosure agreement (NDA) with the inventor. The independent labs testing this device will also have to enter that NDA, and strictly abide by its terms. It is infinitely more logical to entrust well respected institutions like MIT and Princeton (or similarly credentialled physics research institutes) with such responsibilities than to entrust someone nobody ever heard of like Eric with such a thing. One too many beers at the local pub and oops, the whole project is down the toilet, thanks to Eric.

    Secondly, Dr. Greer is about six months away from having to approach a bank to finance this project. Would you really expect Dr. Greer to show up at a bank with a briefcase filled with nothing more than a note from Eric indicating this device works? Would you expect a bank to loan several tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars on the basis of tests conducted at just ONE lab, especially when that one lab is run by someone like Eric?

    As for the taxpayer footing the bill at the DOE lab, first of all we don't even know if in fact the government testing will be funded by the government, or by SEAS. But even if it were funded entirely by the government, I would consider it to be among the wisest expenditures of taxpayer dollars I've ever seen.

    Again, since you seem to have a very hard time grasping this, allow me to reiterate: THE CENTRAL POINT, THE ONE KEY ISSUE AT HAND, IS THE CREDIBILITY OF THE THREE DIFFERENT INDEPENDENT LABS THAT WILL SOON BE TESTING THIS DEVICE. Eric's credibility (or lack thereof) thus becomes an issue only insofar as you have proposed that he alone should be allowed to conduct the independent testing.

    You have insisted that I reply with my real name, which I have done. If you reply (as I'm sure you will - endlessly), please let the rest of us know your real name.

    Sincerely,
    Michael Hoke



    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.