Directly extract and use excess usable energy from the virtual state
Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010 @ 22:18:05 GMT
Topic: Science


Tom Bearden writes: Hi Physics World,

I very much enjoy your publication as a way of keeping up with overall physics progress. Please keep up the good work!

My own work has been in a "field-that-is-not-yet a recognized field", which is extracting usable EM energy directly from the seething virtual state vacuum. Let me expand on that a bit, as it may be of interest to you.

As you are probably aware, recent rigorous physics work of Klimov et al. has now completely proven the capability of building physical devices (in his case, very small nanocrystalline solar cells) which directly extract and use excess usable energy from the virtual state. Klimov's work has been rigorously validated by two great independent laboratories: (1) Los Alamos National Laboratory and (2) National Recoverable Energy Laboratory. This rigorously proven work produces a coefficient of performance of performance from 200% to 700%, and this methodology and its proven results is now published in leading physics journals and nanocrystalline journals.



So one never has to again reprove that real physical systems can extract and use (to power loads) EM energy taken directly from the seething local virtual state vacuum.

One can also further surmise that, if tiny crystals of tourmaline (which are known to continually emit real photons whose energy is also extracted freely from the vacuum) are used as the "photon sources" to freely furnish the input photons to the Klimov microscopic solar cells, then "self-powering" of the Klimov nanocrystalline solar cell system is made possible, with all the system's input photon energy also freely taken from the vacuum via the crazy action of the tourmaline.

If you are really interested in helping solve the pressing world energy crisis, then please note that it is a PHYSICS problem, and not an electrical engineering problem! As you are undoubtedly aware, the sad old electrical engineering model was deliberately crippled by Lorentz (who deliberately symmetrized Heaviside's original equations at the instigation of the infamous J. P. Morgan) in 1892, prior to the very birth of electrical engineering itself. The EEs thus use -- and always have used -- the artificially symmetrized Heaviside-Lorentz equations, not Heaviside's asymmetric equations!

Thus from its inception the present electrical engineering model and technology has been deliberately and diabolically crippled by limiting it to the conception, design, development, and deployment of only self-symmetrizing EM systems -- systems which a priori destroy their own internal source dipoles inside the generator faster than they power their loads.

There is much more if you are interested. We can easily point out a way in which the EE can use a two-stage switched system in ASYMMETRIC fashion, thus drawing only static potential from the system source dipole and never "drawing current". This is possible because so-called "static voltage" is actually a continuous and steady flow of real photons, extracted from the local vacuum by the proven (since 1957; Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang) ASYMMETRIC interaction of the dipole with the virtual state. A dipole, being a broken symmetry, must automatically receive virtual photons from the vacuum in its seething interaction, excite in the virtual state until the observable state is reached by the excitation, and then decay the excitation by emitting a real photon. It continually does this, so it continually produces the so-called "electrostatic" scalar potential (voltage). As Lee pointed out, whenever we have a broken symmetry (such as a dipole is proven to be), then "something previously virtual has become observable".

If a source is required to furnish only "static" voltage, it can do so forever without storage of very much internal charge.

So by potentializing the external circuit with it in PINNED state momentarily (so that the electrons in the conductors momentarily cannot move as current), one may potentialize the coulombs of pinned charge in the external circuit with static voltage only, and without drawing any current from the primary source. Once the external circuit's pinned charges are potentialized, then one switches away the external dipolar source (while the external circuit is still "pinned"), and the now-open-ended potentialized but-still-pinned external circuit is then recompleted separately (as by switching in a diode and resistor load in series with the diode allowing only the standard complete circular rotation of current.

The "statically potentialized" pinned external circuit has very real energy stored in it; the number of joules of stored potential energy is given by the product of the voltage and the amount of interacting pinned charge so potentialized.

Then the temporary pinning expires, and this ALREADY POTENTIALIZED and recompleted SEPARATE external circuit will expend half its stored potential energy to destroy its dipolarity, but it will also use the other half to power its loads and losses.

Then one simply reiterates the two-stage situation and potentializing operation. One POTENTIALIZES "STATICALLY" -- and dissipates non-statically after the primary "static source" is switched away and the diode-and-load inserted.

In this deliberately ASYMMETRIC two-stage operation, one only "pays" a tiny bit of energy input to operate the switching, which may be made very efficient. For "self-powering", the switching circuit is simply made a tiny "load" in the external circuit.

This system can readily be built by even any competent electrical engineering department if its doctorate engineers "think just a bit differently".

There are also a dozen known falsities -- pointed out by eminent scientists such as Nobelists -- still being taught in the sadly mutilated old electrical engineering model, in all our electrical engineering departments. Go to the use of a better (higher group symmetry) modern electrodynamics model (such as quaternion electrodynamics, very close to Maxwell's original theory), and the operation of such asymmetric systems now is included (as it was and is in Maxwell's original 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns).

As an example, Nikola Tesla -- who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that makes modern generators and motors possible, etc.) -- already had discovered ASYMMETRIC circuits in 1890, and was briefing scientific societies that one did not need to "burn fuel" to produce electrical energy! Instead, he pointed out that all the EM energy we need can be obtained directly from the "active medium" (he used that phrase because modern quantum physics and its concept of the active vacuum were not even born yet).

Well, was Tesla mad or did he actually have what he said?

Indeed, he had what he said! For rigorous proof, see the following paper by a great electrodynamicist and cofounder of ultrawideband radar (which itself was said to be "impossible" by the standard science community, even after working models were available. Of course, later UWB radar was proven and developed, and its founders were fully vindicated.) See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.

In Summary: So the standard but seriously crippled symmetrical EE system self-enforces COP<1.0 a priori. And it forces us to usually keep consuming fuel to provide the input energy to keep restoring that source dipole, or else provide controlled wind power, water current power, etc! By cranking the shaft of the generator, we do not input the EM energy that actually powers the load, but only the energy that is translated into rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator, and dissipated therein to restore the internal source dipole that the inane symmetric EE circuit keeps deliberately destroying.

"Work" is rigorously the change of form of energy. And the change of the input shaft rotation mechanical energy to internal rotating magnetic field energy is thus work, and we have to "do work" to continually restore the internal source dipole inside the generator -- not to power the loads in the external circuit!

It's eerie, but that is the only reason for the present world energy crisis, our continued dependence on consumption of oil and other fuels, etc. We have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator only because the self-symmetrized EE system deliberately uses half its potentialization energy to continually destroy the internal source dipole inside the generator, and the other half to power the external circuit's loads and losses.

Since the highly crippled and truncated electrical engineering model and its standard practices themselves are the problem, then to solve the problem we obviously must correct and update that electrical engineering model itself. Specifically, we must learn to design, deploy, and utilize asymmetrical EM systems of the type (2) kind that we require.

Obviously it is a physics problem, not an electrical engineering problem!

We already have higher group symmetry electrodynamics models readily available in modern physics, and so we even have a few highly competent higher group symmetry electrodynamicists (such as Barrett and Harmuth, co-founders of ultrawideband radar). The higher group symmetry electrodynamics models also do incorporate asymmetric Maxwellian systems (Type 2 systems) as well as the standard symmetrical Maxwellian systems (Type 1 systems).

Hence we need to fund and provide a Manhattan Project using such special higher group symmetry electrodynamicists, modeling physicists, experimentalists to conduct the necessary physics experiments for proper fitting of the eventual "models", etc.

It is a primary physics problem, not an electrical engineering problem!

This is the answer -- the only really viable answer -- to the escalating energy crisis worldwide, and its portent for the imminent economic collapse of the United States and much of the Western World.


Very best wishes,

Thomas E. Bearden

Lt. Col., U.S. Army (retired)







This article comes from ZPEnergy.com
http://www.zpenergy.com

The URL for this story is:
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3167