
The downside of a good idea
Date: Friday, February 22, 2008 @ 22:23:14 UTC Topic: Science
Good ideas can have drawbacks. When information is freely shared, good
ideas can stunt innovation by distracting others from pursuing even
better ideas, according to Indiana University cognitive scientist
Robert Goldstone.
"How do you structure your
community so you get the best solution out of the group?" Goldstone
said. "It turns out not to be effective if different inventors and labs
see exactly what everyone else is doing because of the human tendency
to glom onto the current 'best' solution."
Goldstone's findings were
published this month in the January/February issue of the journal
"Current Directions in Psychological Science." Michael E. Roberts, a
doctoral student in the Cognitive Science Program, and Todd M.
Gureckis, assistant professor of psychology at New York University, are
co-authors of the article "Emergent Processes in Group Behavior."
Goldstone's research examines and charts group behavior and the
patterns in which people unknowingly participate -- much like ants
creating colony structures about which they are clueless.
This study used a virtual environment in which study participants
worked in specifically designed groups to solve a problem. Participants
guessed numbers between 1 and 100, with each number having a hidden
value. The goal was for individuals to accumulate the highest score
through several rounds of guessing. Across different conditions, the
relationship between guesses and scores could either be simple or
complex. The participants saw the results of their own guesses and some
or all of the guesses of the others in their group.
In the "fully connected"
group, everyone's work was completely accessible to everyone else --
much like a tight-knit family or small town. In the "locally connected"
group, participants primarily were aware of what their neighbors, or
the people on either side, were doing. In the "small world" group,
participants also were primarily aware of what their neighbors were
doing, but they also had a few distant connections that let them send
or retrieve good ideas from outside of their neighborhood.
Goldstone found that the fully connected groups performed the best
when solving simple problems. Small world groups, however, performed
better on more difficult problems. For these problems, the truism "The
more information, the better" is not valid.
"The small world network preserves diversity," Goldstone said. "One
clique could be coming up with one answer, another clique could be
coming up with another. As a result, the group as a whole is searching
the problem space more effectively. For hard problems, connecting
people by small world networks offers a good compromise between having
members explore a variety of innovations, while still quickly
disseminating promising innovations throughout the group.
Source: Indiana University Via: http://www.physorg.com/news122709617.html
|
|