Could Crazy Technology Save the Planet?
Date: Saturday, March 17, 2007 @ 18:32:40 MST
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer/
(AP) -- Crazy-sounding ideas for saving the planet are getting a
serious look from top scientists, a sign of their fears about global
warming and the desire for an insurance policy in case things get
worse. How crazy?
There's the man-made "volcano" that shoots gigatons of sulfur high into the air. The space "sun shade" made of trillions of little reflectors between Earth and sun, slightly lowering the planet's temperature. The forest of ugly artificial "trees" that suck carbon dioxide out of the air. And the "Geritol solution" in which iron dust is dumped into the ocean.
"Of course it's desperation," said Stanford University professor Stephen Schneider. "It's planetary methadone for our planetary heroin addiction. It does come out of the pessimism of any realist that says this planet can't be trusted to do the right thing."
NASA is putting the finishing touches on a report summing up some of these ideas and has spent $75,000 to map out rough details of the sun shade concept. One of the premier climate modeling centers in the United States, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, has spent the last six weeks running computer simulations of the man-made volcano scenario and will soon turn its attention to the space umbrella idea.
And last month, billionaire Richard Branson offered a $25 million prize to the first feasible technology to reduce carbon dioxide levels in the air.
Simon "Pete" Worden, who heads NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., says some of these proposals, which represent a field called geoengineering, have been characterized as anywhere from "great" to "idiotic." As if to distance NASA from the issue a bit, Worden said the agency's report won't do much more than explain the range of possibilities.
Scientists in the recent past have been reluctant to consider such concepts. Many fear there will be unintended side effects; others worry such schemes might prevent the type of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions that scientists say are the only real way to fight global warming. These approaches are not an alternative to cutting pollution, said University of Calgary professor David Keith, a top geoengineering researcher.
Last month, Ralph Cicerone, president of the National Academy of Sciences, told the nation's largest science conference that more research must be done in this field, but no action should be taken yet.
Here is a look at some of the ideas:
Full article: http://www.physorg.com/news93185141.html
--------------- In other related news:
DANISH SCIENTIST: GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH, March 15
A Danish scientist said
the idea of a "global temperature" and global warming is more political than
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news93193025.html
WINTER WARMEST ON RECORD WORLDWIDE, March 15
(AP) -- This winter was the
warmest on record worldwide, the government said Thursday in the latest
worrisome report focusing on changing climate. The report comes just over a
month after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said global warming is
very likely caused by human actions and is so severe it will continue for
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news93199867.html
GLOBAL 'SUNSCREEN' HAS LIKELY THINNED, REPORT NASA SCIENTISTS, March 15
new NASA study has found that an important counter-balance to the warming of our
planet by greenhouse gases - sunlight blocked by dust, pollution and other
aerosol particles - appears to have lost ground.
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news93190359.html
WARMING OCEANS THREATEN ANTARCTIC GLACIERS, March 15
identified four Antarctic glaciers that pose a threat to future sea levels using
satellite observations, according to a study published in the journal
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news93191513.html
ARCTIC SEA ICE DECLINE MAY TRIGGER CLIMATE CHANGE CASCADE, March 15
sea ice that has been dwindling for several decades may have reached a tipping
point that could trigger a cascade of climate change reaching into Earth's
temperate regions, says a new University of Colorado at Boulder study.
story at http://www.physorg.com/news93198898.html
I wonder why the top scientists are not seriously looking at other "crazy-sounding ideas for saving the planet" that we, in the new-energy community, are begging them to look at, for years ??? (The resistance to a new idea increases as the square of its importance." - Bertrand Russell)