ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 502 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: TAO of BIG-BANG & GRAVITY/SUPER-GRAVITY & DARK-ENERGY SUPER COSMOS (Score: 1)
by vlad on Thursday, March 20, 2008 @ 13:00:14 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
He, he ...I'm afraid you're right Koen! ... and indeed, Jake Harbach sent all these on St. Patrick's day ;-).

Nevertheless, the guy is a "science-fiction" poet and he has talent. I briefly corresponded with one JOSullivan Candelaria years ago and, since the styles are almost similar, I suspect Jake Harbach O'Sullivan and JOS Candelaria are one and the same person Here is a sample from JOS Candelaria:

--------------
JOSullivan Candelaria wrote:


Cheers! :-) John e-posted me some of your commentary on 'Star-Trek' types of technologies etc. I've been involved with project inputs to NASA's 'Advanced Research Propulsion Project' with Boeing and Lockheed and others who have interfaced my 'stuff' with 'String Theory' inputs and Hutchison-Effects inputs to great facility (not to mention the inputs of 'many' other good minds!). *I would say that WE ALL 'collectively' have actually now stepped well beyond the 'THRESHHOLD OF OUR DREAM*' and this specifically in regards to those matters which you address. ( Extremely Cool! :-)

The Cosmos-Aexocosmos (sub-space-ZPE, etc.) as a vast kaliedoscopic array of fractalating 'branes' yielding its probable endless array of Universes and quasi-dimensional possibilities; more and more, needs POETRY as unified with PHYSICS to appropriately express. In essence, merely 'pure' mathematics minus a well developed 'aesthetic' perceptual giftedness cannot (and will never) be able to appropriately articulate the technical parameters of these 'NEW FRONTIERS' upon which we are all embarking.

Relative to this introduction I am going to post you (one plus 61) e-mails from the site .......... Admittedly there is 'much' redundancy throughout this e-mail cluster; but please forgive my presumptiveness; and I am sincerely NOT intending to blindly 'spam' you.

My motive is merely to exchange inspiration on OUR COLLECTIVE ROAD of discovery. And if you do happen to gain even a 'grain' of corroborative insight; then maybe it will have been for some good.

Sincerely,

Jake Candelaria ;->
--------------

When I have more time, I'll collect all his e-mails and put them in one file so people can enjoy his "fantastic-science poetry". This is the "problem" with all theoretical physicists (Jack Sarfatti as well): they essentially do not care for proving their theories; this is considered other people's job. I do not blame them I just do not agree with this attitude ... I wish they would work much harder with those who try to devise experiments to prove these beautiful (some) but complex intellectual constructs.

Koen, as you know, am now proposing the XSF project which would emphasize on finding whatever experimental evidence is out there to support such theories that are currently considered too far outside of the conventional science. Unfortunately, I work alone, and I would certainly need help.

Vlad


| Parent

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.