Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 541 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Re: DR HAL PUTHOFF: From SRI to ZPE (Score: 1) by Koen on Friday, December 29, 2006 @ 07:02:26 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla Yeah, this is what I mean Roy:  the 'second law' is already violated by a Coulomb charge: it orders incoming ZPF energy into a coherent macroscopic Coulomb field (electric field) that consists of outgoing waves.  This is where I agree with Bearden: an electric field or magnetic field is some sort of ORDERING (lower energetic state) of the ZPF, since the incoming ZPF waves have RANDOM wave phases, and according to Whittaker the Coulomb field consists of outgoing longitudinal waves with ORDERED wave phases. This 'ordering process' is an example of negative entropy. So you are right Roy,  nature  shows also negative entropic processes, goodbuy second law of thermodynamics. If entropy can only increase, and finally the cosmos dies by reaching the lowest energy state,  how do you explain the very existence of HIGHER energy state and a dynamical cosmos in the first place? How did the cosmos got into a "higher"  energy state? It is unscientific to "explain" this by postulating the Big Bang, since this is an ad hoc "explanation" for which there is no proof. There can always be an experimental fact that refutes a cherished physics law, no matter what law. The problem with  Puthoff's theory is that it does not describe any phase coherence/ordering. | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.