ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 638 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Useful Energy Always Runs Out (Score: 1)
    by FDT on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 @ 14:08:57 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Hal,
         You covered a number of interesting areas in your reply.
         (1) The fact that energy is never destroyed, but only changes form.
         (2) Energy dissipation via electromagnetic radiation.
         (3) Mass energy equivalence.
         (4) The effect of the electric sea on gravity.

    Let's start with (1). Yes, energy is never destroyed and so there is no theoretical reason why exhaust energy can't immediately go back into the original source and repeat the cycle over and over again. In fact it is probably wrong for us to link in our minds the law of conservation of energy with another completely different law which we observe in practice ie. that 'Useful energy always runs out'.

    Now let's look at (2). We must distinguish between the energy which is stored in the electric sea on the one hand, and electric and magnetic field energy on the other hand. The latter also involve energy storage in the electric sea, but they relate exclusively to the additional energy which is stored in the electric sea, over and above that which is intrinsically present in the equilibrium state. This additional energy arises out of the stress of linear polarization and magnetization. Electromagnetic radiation is about the propagation of this additional energy through the electric sea, and is not directly linked to the intrinsic energy of the electric sea in its equilibrium state. If Steorn are correct, I suspect that they will have found a way of extracting energy out of the electric sea such as to reduce the overall equilibrium energy. If this energy is then later dissipated as electromagnetic radiation through the electric sea, that is not the same as it being returned back into the electric sea. It will be propagated elsewhere, and I have no idea how many stages will be involved throughout the universe before this energy, if ever, is restored into the electric sea.

        (3) Mass energy equivalence does not exist. Einstein's famous equation E=mc² is actually Newton's equation for the speed of sound. Maxwell uses this equation in his 1861 paper (at equation 132) to show that light is an electromagnetic wave. Dr. Simhony has shown that the energy term refers to the binding energy between the electrons and positrons.

        (4) Until recently, I wouldn't have linked the electric sea to gravity at all. However, in view of my recent conclusion that gravity is negative electricity,

    http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe6.pdf

           then it does indeed follow that changes in the intrinsic energy of the electric sea will lead to changes in the transverse elasticity and hence the permittivity, and hence the magnitude of the Coulomb force acting between charged bodies immersed in the electric sea.

    Finally, you are absolutely right. If we can get a few million years of use out of Steorn's invention, then it truly will be a remarkable invention, even if the supply is not actually infinite.
    Yours sincerely, David Tombe


    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.