ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 421 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nature of Gravity and the Vacuum of Space (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Sunday, June 04, 2006 @ 13:25:34 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Mark Solis writes: Greetings All,

    Here is my opinion on gravitation as of this date:

    1 - Nature of gravity and inertia: Dr. Frederick Alzofon is correct.

    2 - Gravitational "push" as per Dr. Charles F. Brush et al, actually not the way it works. It has to do with the omnidirectional linkage of the virtual particles and their constant teleportation all over the universe. THAT is where the "aether shadow" gets into it.

    3 - The nature of time: is NOT understood properly by mainstream science. "Time is what a clock says" doesn't cut it by a long shot. (I have some things I could say, but for now, I'm not talking.)

    4 - Lorentzian equations describe ONLY the behavior OF THE AETHER AS A MEDIUM THROUGH WHICH EVENTS ARE OBSERVED. The "two observers in relative motion" in fact can't even see each other at all. (THINK before you criticize that comment. I'll tear you to pieces on it.)

    5 - The postulates of BOTH so-called "Relativity Theories" are ALL nothing but B.S. (Anybody who at least READS the journals ought to know THAT.) (I personally think that Relativity as commonly taught is a crap theory.)

    6 - There are exactly FOUR THEORETICAL PILLARS of ALL physical reality at this point (in my own opinion):

    ** (1) The spontaneous emission model of the quantum vacuum;
    ** (2) The Bergman particle model ("Bergman's Basic Four")
    ** (3) Basic string theory (JUST the basic theory)
    ** (4) The temporal wave and temporal antiwave (Newton's First Law, Dynamic Case, for which the temporal wave is nothing more than a composition of string functions, and the antiwave is its time- reversed counter-image, responsible for prescience, deja vu, etc.)

    It is my considered and summary opinion that the above four models describe ALL OF EXISTENCE. This includes the "Multiverse" (for which delineation of the individual universes is a matter of a phase angle for particle spin [from the six particle properties: mass, charge, spin, hypercharge, isospin, and baryon number].)

    The so-called "extraneous solutions" for the spin equations are in fact valid solutions with phase angles. (The "normal" solutions simply have a zero phase angle.) The non-zero phase angles are for particles in other universes.

    You want a model for gravitation?

    Fit it into the above. Anything else is throwing Occam's Razor right out the window.

    I can't WAIT to see either (1) the stunned silence, or (2) the gaggle- fit, that follows THIS E-mail. ;))

    Yours truly,

    Mark A. Solis
    your_neibghbor_2000@yahoo.com

    P.S.: One might observe that some might say that there is a "fifth theoretical element" to existence: CONSCIOUSNESS. Well, perhaps. There's just one teeny tiny little problem with that:

    DEFINE IT.

    ---MAS


    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.