ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 348 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Magnesium battery patents (Score: 1)
    by aironoeus on Friday, August 27, 2004 @ 03:05:51 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Um, it uh, has a um, uh LOT MORE ENERGY!
    And it uh, um, has um, NON TOXIC ELECTRODES!
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong cuz if they show highs of 420mAh/g then shouldn't it scale up like this.
    4200mAh/10g
    42000mAh/100g
    420000mAh/1000g
    420 AMPS at 3 volts for 1kg
    So that's an energy density of 1260Wh/Kg.
    That's incredibly high; blowing away everthing including tadirans non-rechargable thionyl batteries with the supercaps embedded on top of them.
    Am I figuring this right. As far as a pre-manufactured rating - meaning before the thermoplastic/metalized-plastic layers get added to the final consumer device.
    Aren't you geting tired of breathing hydrogen sulfide when you recharge your SLA's or worrying about leaking cadmium (cadmium is irreversibly toxic) or wondering whether today will be the day that your lithiums overheat and blow up and melt a whole through your leg while you are on your electric bike.
    You must not have paid attention to the post.
    So I guess I'll reiterate it again here.

    There are two batteries here that I wrote about.
    The first is Aurbach's.
    Aurbach's last a VERY VERY long time AND THEY CAN BE DISCHARGED TOTALLY 100% WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AND THEY ARE NON-TOXIC.
    Homer simpson would probably say, "ummmmm.....SAFE....long lasting.......I can abuse it and throw in the trash."
    Is that clear enough?

    For the Matsushita patent I'm pretty sure you can probably say the same thing for them safety wise because neither silver oxide nor magnesium is toxic and I doubt you are going to coax any of those halogens out of the electrolyte unless you over charge them by probably about 1.5 volts per cell.
    (Since they were able to get 4 volts using a Vanadium cathode in the same solvents and anions).
    However the big thing is the awesome energy density.
    Funny how my post on VisforVoltage forums got over here.


    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.