|There are currently, 175 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
Rotation: A Powerful Gateway|
Posted on Sunday, November 23, 2003 @ 14:38:57 MST by vlad
Leslie R. Pastor writes:
Rotation is a powerful gateway into an etheric 4-Space world of gated
possibilities. Rotation is a key fundamental in examining significant
links harnessing significant [dimensional] properties enabling the extraction of
novel attributes not [normally] found in 3-Space [structured] formats. So
let us examine some attributes.
What is a rotating magnetic field and who discovered this principle, powerful,
and useful phenomenon?
Nikola Tesla http://www.pactran.com/tesla.html
is[the] one individual http://www.teslasociety.com/magnetic.htm
who is recognized as having discovered the phenomenon of the 'rotating magnetic
field,' which ultimately led to the construction of http://www.teslasociety.com/strasbourg.htm
the first induction motor. This discovery enabled Tesla to develop the use
of alternating current, establishing the AC paradigm. But who was this man
Nikola Tesla, and what did he http://home.earthlink.net/~drestinblack/tesla_inventor.htm
accomplish with his discoveries.
Dale Pond http://www.svpvril.com/dalebio.html
has referred to the 'universe' as a 'musical' universe, and I suspect that Tesla
may have had similar 'conception' as well http://flyingmoose.org/truthfic/tesmusic.htm
when he attempted to 'analyze' the frequency ranges between alternating currents
and light waves. Dale's interpretation has been 'mirrored' http://ascension2000.com/lauralee.htm
with an interesting corroboration.
Dr. Antony C. Sutton [The View From 4-Space p. 65-69] believed that,
"Rotation, or the 'spin thing', as [the late] Professor [Eric] Laithwaite
of [the] University of London used to call rotation, has a key role in 4-Space
as a gating mechanism and is identified in a variety of technologies, some
already in use." [Sutton]
"Several are not thought of as 'technology' in 3-Space terms but fit the
characteristics of 4-Space technologies. Rotation and vortices are common
attributes and sound is a creative mechanism." [Sutton]
[Rotation is significant, but unfortunately, 'significantly' misunderstood.]
"The Schauberger technologies depend on centripetal action, not the
centrifugal action of the current thermodynamic cycle." [Sutton]
"The Schauberger vortical biological vacuum is centripetal (an inward
cycle) rather than centrifugal (outwards). Interestingly the Chaldeans
used this method to induce favorable weather, an ancient precursor to Constable
etheric techniques using votical gates." [Sutton]
"Rotation is also linked to another subtle energy, the life force, or
"chi." The Tibetan lamas have a tradition, to achieve longevity by
daily clockwise rotation exercises." [Sutton]
"Orthorotation of an electric flux is used by Moray King to gate
electricity from the fourth [4th] dimension."
"More down to earth in present 20th Century technology: the gyroscope has
4-Space properties when precessing (spinning). According to Laithwaite,
DePalma, Kelly, Baumgardner and others experimentation shows that Newton's Laws
of Motion only apply to motion in straight lines where there is no change in the
rate of acceleration." [Sutton]
"A gyroscope is essentially a wheel mounted on a universal joint so that
its axis may lie in any direction. While orthodox scientists claim that
all gyroscopic properties can be explained by Newton's Law of Motion, this is
hardly so. For example:
(1) If you weigh a gyroscope on a precision balance and
weigh it again when spinning on a vertical axis, it will always weigh less when
spinning. Newton does not cover this case.
(2) A gyroscope precessing on a tower on a horizontal
plane will not topple or fall. It defies the pull of gravity. A
stationary gyroscope cannot remain in the horizontal position without toppling.
(3) In the 1970s Bruce DePalma former MIT physics
instructor experimented with rotating balls to observe the interaction of
gravitational and inertial forces. Newton's laws do not distinguish
between rotating and non-rotating objects. Neither did Einstein. In
DePalma experiments repeated elsewhere, a rotating ball falls faster than a
non-rotating ball. In other words rotation affects the mechanical
properties of an object. [Sutton]
"These 4-Space characteristics are today used in 3-Space technology without
their actions being fully understood. Accelerometers, automatic pilots,
gyrocompasses, gyroscopic ship stabilizers all make use of these unexplained
properties. In brief we already have a few 4-Space technologies proven,
useful and operating."
"DePalma's conclusions are worth noting:
The momentous fact is that there is no special interaction between rotation and
gravity. The behavior of rotating objects is explained simply on the
addition of free energy to whatever motion the rotating object is making.
The spinning object goes higher and falls faster than the identical non-rotating
In brief, one can access the 4-Space world of free energy or "this
addition of free energy" in several forms by rotation." [Sutton]
"The reaction of MIT to DePalma has to be noted. Honest science would
record these results and draw conclusions for theory and new technology.
To the contrary MIT ejected DePalma from his instructor's position.
He then went to the Sunburst Community in Santa Barbara, not an academic
institution, where he developed a practical over unity N-machine, an electrical
generating device. In other words, a closed community not concerned with
technology was able to recognize and support a technology with greater accuracy
and honest response than the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which is the
recipient of massive U.S. Government funds and respect. We will see later
that MIT repeated this dishonest activity with regard to cold fusion.
Further the author [Sutton] can personally confirm this suppressive activity a
few years before DePalma at Hoover Institution, Stanford University."
"DePalma was unable to fight the academic establishment on its own ground
and later went to Australia and New Zealand." [Sutton}
"We have no doubt that numerous similar cases will sooner or later surface.
In the meantime be assured that Thomas Kuhn was right when he argued that
orthodoxy will not tolerate any challenge to its dominance..they can never be
wrong. We have not doubt that would be students may read this book [The
View From 4-Space] and be concerned for their own future. Our
suggestion is to keep away from the so-called "prestigious
establishments" and look carefully at smaller almost unknown establishments
with open-minded faculty members, or try to bypass establishment-state
institutions. At some point we anticipate private voluntary communities
will be established." [Antony C. Sutton: The View From 4-Space pp 66-69]
Editors note: For me Dr. Antony C. Sutton was an 'eye' opener. Had he
lived longer his research would have provided significant clues [directions]
into significant aspects of 4-Space phenomena, especially those dealing with
Tesla's later discoveries.
Rotation is a powerful gateway that has extracted for us significant resources
already [motors, generators, energy (AC/DC) ], within our everyday [3-Space]
world. Rotation continues beyond into the higher framework of
4-space, extracting for us future paradigms incorporating anti-gravity and
primary energy sources outside of [and framing] 3-space constraints.
Variant aspects of 4-Space research, continues in private and public forums.
What is needed is 'openness' and 'unity' in 'understanding' what these dynamics
will provide when properly harnessed.
All the Best,
Leslie R. Pastor
Research: Rotating Magnetic Field
AC Motors, Generator
Physics of Plasmas
Rotating Magnetic Fields
The Sun's Magnetic Field
The Earth's Magnetic Field
Dark Matter: Magnetic Fields & Galactic Rotation
Single Phase Induction Motors
Fundamentals of Electric/Magnetic Fields
rotating disk in a magnetic field
Rotating Magnetic Fields in Galaxies
discovery of the rotating magnetic field
and the 'Tesla' Unit [Rathaus, Munich, Germany]
The Mechanical Universe and Beyond
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Average Score: 4.57|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register|
|Re: Rotation: A Powerful Gateway (Score: 1)|
by ElectroDynaCat on Sunday, November 23, 2003 @ 16:48:04 MST
(User Info | Send a Message)
|Energy Loop Closing in Rotating N type devices.|
A carefull analysis of the energy accounting shows us that for an energy loop to close and the device to self sustain, the device must have a COP of at least 1+1/Ce, where Ce is the conversion effectiveness of the device that converts the energy output of the device back into excitation. Considering that in most rotating discs devices this mechanism is an electric motor that is generally 85% efficient. Therfore any rotating disc device with a "purported" COP of over 1.2 should be able to run on their own and provide proof of the creation of a perpetual motion device, along with instant fame for the inventors. So far no one has been able to provide even this feeble level of performance. I'm still waiting along with the rest of the scientific community.
|Re: Rotation: A Powerful Gateway (Score: 1)|
by Nano (firstname.lastname@example.org) on Sunday, November 23, 2003 @ 20:11:03 MST
(User Info | Send a Message)
|What about the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, the MEG, that was built by Thomas Bearden, J Naudin, and others? |
|Re: Rotation: A Powerful Gateway (Score: 1)|
by ElectroDynaCat on Monday, November 24, 2003 @ 17:27:26 MST
(User Info | Send a Message)
|I haven't been able to see where all the wires on the MEG come from, in most pictures there seems to be a battery or an outside power connection, therefore I must refrain from any comment as to its effectivenesss as an energy source. It would seem simple enough to connect the output to the drive source, close the loop, and walk into scientific and technical history. Why the developers haven't performed this simple act is something that they must answer on their own. Consider that a transformer circuit, which the MEG appears to be, is the most efficient of all energy conversion devices, bordering on 99.9%, the COP neccessary to make the device self sustaining would be very little more than 1. I am not sure what COP the developers are claiming for the MEG.|
|Re: Some info on the MEG sources of energy (Score: 1)|
by vlad on Monday, November 24, 2003 @ 22:26:12 MST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
|From one of Tom Bearden's correspondence files:|
…It isn't just a regular transformer. Of course a "one-reservoir of energy" transformer, where one pays to input all the energy in the reservoir, will not produce COP>1.0. The transformer will inevitably have at least some losses, so one will get out less energy than one inputs. A good transformer may have, e.g., an efficiency of 90%, as you are aware. A top-notch transformer might achieve 95%.
On the other hand, for the MEG, one must get out of the electrical engineering text and Maxwell-Heaviside electrodynamics and check out papers in the Aharonov-Bohm effect, later generalized to the Berry Phase (Michael Berry has a very nice website where you can download lots of good papers), and then further generalized to geometric phase. There are more than 20,000 papers in the hard physics literature on those areas of geometric phase, but it is not in electrical engineering. Nonetheless, it is solid physics, now well known and applied for several decades.
Or just check in Feynman's three volumes of physics for the Aharonov-Bohm effect (he spells Aharonov as "Aharanov", at least in the older editions). When one localizes the B-field flux in a local area (such as inside a good toroidal coil), then all the B-field flux is held inside the coils themselves, and none spills into the space outside the coils. In short, one confines ALL the magnetic field flux one uses in a normal transformer (and one pays for) inside the toroid. When that is done, the outside spacetime is still curved general relativistically. So the curvature of spacetime itself produces an extra field-free (curl-free) A-potential in that space outside the coil. That is a SECOND energy reservoir, and one does not have to pay for it. It's provided freely by nature (by the environment, i.e., the curved spacetime). That is the original Aharonov-Bohm effect, now completely proven and accepted. But no one thought to use it for power before.
So we found a transformer core material that does the same thing a good toroidal coil does. The core material localizes all the B-field flux inside the core material itself, and that gives us the same energy available in the core alone, that a normal excellent transformer could have in total. That is the FIRST energy reservoir in the MEG from which one can extract energy.
Simultaneously, the Aharonov-Bohm effect results in a FREE, SECOND energy reservoir outside the core, again in the form of a curl-free (field-free) A-potential in that outside space.
Using d for the partial differentiation symbol because of this E-mail medium: As is in all the text-books, dA/dt = - E, where the magnitude of the E-field depends on the time rate of change of the A-potential, NOT just on the magnitude of that A-potential. Voila! By shaping the leading edge and trailing edge of the nearly rectangular input pulses we use to input to the primary coil around the core, we can determine the magnitude of the produced E-fields in space surrounding the core. That's in addition to the NORMAL transformer functioning, using the B-flux inside the core material (now an H-flux because it's in physical material).
So from the core flux, we can have the performance of a normal transformer with an efficiency of, say, 90%. So from the FIRST energy reservoir (the core flux energy), we can take off 90% of the energy into the secondary and output from it, just like a normal transformer.
However, from the SECOND energy reservoir, we also simultaneously get an input E-field reaction directly from the surrounding space and into that secondary coil. In short, if we carefully time and phase everything by adroit switching, we can get more energy into that output coil from the E-field in surrounding space, than we get into it from the H-flux inside the core.
In short, we have taken advantage of nature's kindness, where nature freely formed an EXTRA energy reservoir for us and made it available if we wished to use it. We collected some of that EXTRA energy gratefully in the secondary, in addition to the energy collected in quite normal fashion from the FIRST energy reservoir.
So the total output energy is that 90% of the energy in the first reservoir, plus more than that from the second energy reservoir which we make fairly large.
You are aware that, from any given E-field, one can collect as much emf as one has charge to intercept it -- that is the simple equation F = Eq. So we adjust the output coil so that it has a substantial surface charge --- more q. This means that, from that impinging E-field from the SECOND energy reservoir in space outside the core, we can collect just as much energy as we wish, subject only to the limitations of the amount of surface charge we arrange in the secondary. Let us say that we get twice as much energy in that output coil from the EXTRA, FREE external E-field reaction as we get from the internal H-flux and its reactions. Then, using the 90% efficiency for the "normal transformer collection from the first reservoir only), we have (0.9 + 1.8) as much output energy in the secondary as we have available in the normal H-flux in the primary coil. That means we have 2.7 times as much output energy as is available in the input coil.
Now suppose our input efficiency (any switching circuit wastes some) is only 50% (we can actually do quite a bit better, but let's be very conservative). So we have to input and pay for twice as much energy as we get available in that input primary coil. This means that, in terms of "available energy W in the input coil), our input energy we pay for is 2W. The total output energy we get in the secondary is (2.7 W). The COP, defined as COP = (useful output)/(total paid input by the operator) is 2.7W divided by 2W, which is equal to COP = 1.35. As we stated, we can then adjust the second reservoir's energy easily, increase efficiency of switching, etc. A reasonable COP to shoot for is about COP = 5.0. By very special measures (not discussed yet; we still have to file additional patents) we can drive that to COP = 10.0 or so.
Note that none of this violates conservation of energy, and none of it violates the second law of thermodynamics. The overall efficiency Eff is still Eff
The decisive signature is the deviation of the normal 90 degrees or so phase difference between output voltage and output current. We can produce a "supertransformer" where that phase difference may be as small as two degrees. So in another way, in that case we have produced almost a totally ELECTRICAL transformer. Or said another way, the ELECTRICAL functioning of the MEG then becomes much more important than its MAGNETIC performance, as the primary energy-output reaction mechanism.
Hope this helps. It really cannot be explained any simpler than that. If you wish a very strong theoretical explanation of the MEG's fundamental mechanism of operation, then check the following two papers:
M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator with O(3) Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(1), Feb. 2001, p. 87-94.
M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator by Sachs's Theory of Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(4), 2001, p. 387-393.
|Re: Rotation: A Powerful Gateway (Score: 0)|
by Anonymous on Saturday, June 05, 2004 @ 03:22:46 MST
|A carefull analysis of energy accounting shows|
that there is no conversion factor, where the electric energy is converted to mechanal energy in electric motors. The text books state that the electric energy is moving the electrons through the restance in the wire, thus being disapated as heat only. The current would be droping along the wires as the input energy was converted. Have you seen any current droup anyone?No
The 85% efficient electric motor will allways
disapate 100% of the input electric energy as heat and the use of the magnetic field will be OU.
Make a simple electric motor with Alumnum wire cool it to -320 degrees F. the electrical restances will be about 500 times less than at room temp. The magnetic field power will also be increased with the same input of electric energy. What do you think will happen? Why has the US NAVY produced supperconducting electic motors for their ships?
Look at the cold fusion concept it is not fusion, but
is a true accounting test of the conservation of electric energy. When you have simple restance heating you have COP 1. But when the arc gets involved you begain to see the magnetic field will produce the COP> part. The better the magnetic field is used the higher the COP.