ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 333 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Nu Energy Cell Update
Posted on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 @ 12:06:01 UTC by rob

Devices Good Day Everyone!

It was suggested by a couple of electronics experts who tested my Nu Energy(TM) Cells at my recent demonstration in Salt Lake City, Utah - that my cells are broad-band high capacitance diodes that receive stray radio-frequencies and convert them into a direct current. This seemed logical as the current obtained from the components could be explained with this theory...



Initially, some of the components showed spikes on my oscilloscope that looked like radio-noise. However, this now appears to be due to the poor wire contact that was made by placing a short wire across the carbon cylinder. With a secure clamp no noise is observed on the scope. From this I have to conclude that the current is not coming from an external radio source.

Placing a small shaving of the chemalloy in a salt solution under a high powered microscope shows that there are minute gas bubbles that are being ejected from the pores of the oxide layer that is formed on the alloy. The slow reaction is due to the gas bubbles clinging to the surface of the oxide layer and blocking reaction with the salt solution. In a conventional battery cell the reaction is so fast that the anode generates more gas than can be absorbed by its cathode and electrons are wasted.

The slow reaction in a Nu Energy cell appears to be the key to its extreme efficiency. This is real nuts and bolts "over-unity" in the sense that off-the-self batteries do not achieve the extreme efficiency of the Nu Energy cell. However, the Nu Energy cell will become the new measure that represens a closer to 100% efficiency than has been presently perceived in store bought primary batteries and the reaction will no longer be an over-unity phenomenon. Until it becomes the new standard it will be perceived to be an over-unity effect.

-B.A. Perreault
September 14, 2004

Nu Energy Horizon homepage

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by rob


Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 2.33
Votes: 3


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Nu Energy Cell Update" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Nu Energy Cell Update (Score: 1)
by raccoon on Sunday, September 19, 2004 @ 12:46:58 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Your "over-unity" (better efficiency) is not real over-unity, so why do you expect "us" to perceive your new epxerimental device as a true over-unity device (see your last sentence, BAP) ??
That does not make sense, Bruce, and I have lost faith in your over-optimistic estimations of the market-potential of any of your devices.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.