ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 122 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Mills' Results Not Reproduced by Independent Laboratory
Posted on Monday, August 02, 2004 @ 19:50:30 GMT by vlad

Science In the hydrino yahoo group Mike Carrell (MC) writes: Woogie wrote: There is a new paper in the Journal of Applied Physics [v. 95, pp 24-29, (2004)] which reproduces the experiments of Mills, et al. which claimed the production of very hot H atoms in a microwave plasma. These atoms were thought to be hot because of the very broad linewidth -- attributed to Doppler broadening by Mills. Mills claimed that these broad line profiles were proof that the Hydrino-izing process was taking place.
------
MC: Being diligent, I downloaded the paper by Jovicevic et.al. and read through it, looking for significant differences between what they did and BLP did. I then asked Mills for an explanation. His reply:

Mike,

We didn't see any effect with wave-guided pulsed cells either. Jovicevic et. al. do mention a small hot population, but basically they report no broadening with pulsed microwaves.

There are many reports in the literature regarding line broadening including independent results from Jonathan Phillips at LANL. There is no question that there is Doppler line broadening of only the H lines in specific H-mixed gas plasmas. There is a debate as to its origin. All of the nonBLP explanations depend on field acceleration of positive H ions. We have disproved this explanation by observing time-dependent broadening in regions were there is no field. This result has been confirmed:

http://www.blacklightpower.com/pdf/technical/HotAtomicHydrogen092603.pdf

Randy
---------

Jovicicevic et.al. used pulses "between 3 and 6 ms with a repetition rate of 60 pps", a duty cycle of 18 to 36% .

BLP uses an Opthos MPG-4M generator which can function in a CW and pulsed mode. The ouput power can be continuously varied from 0-120 watts, apparently with what appears as a Variac knob on the front panel.

So Jovicevic et.al. violated the cardinal rule about duplicating an experiment, which is to duplicate the actual experiment and not do something else which only seems like the experiment in question. Woogie, with his eye to the spectroscope, missed the difference, as I did.

Why would this be important? In many respects Jovicevic et. al. made an honest effort to duplicate the BLP experiment using equipment at hand, not realizing that the excitation duty cycle would be important.

The pressure and gas mixtures used were within the range that BLP used, but the flow rate through the cell is not reported, or is there any indication that it was measured. Three milliseconds is long on the time scale of most plasma phenomena.

Consider that the BLP catalytic reaction is rare but very energetic among competing reactions in the H2-Ar plasma. The mean free path is of the order of a millimeter at the pressures BLP uses. Pulsing allows all atoms to revert to a neutral state between pulses.

At present, I don't have a good answer to reconcile the many experiments where substantial line broadening is reported in steady state experiments with the failure in pulsed experiments. In one conversation, Mills remarked that the gas kinetics in the cells has a lot to do with whether the BLP reaction turns on strongly or not.

For now, however, the Jovicevic et.al. paper stands as an experiment which did not actually duplicate the BLP reaction conditions as reported in a previous paper by Mills et.al. in JAP. It is therefore not a refutation of Mills claims.

Mike Carrell

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Mills' Results Not Reproduced by Independent Laboratory" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

New Mills Patent application (Score: 1)
by vlad on Tuesday, August 03, 2004 @ 21:47:32 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
In the hydrino yahoo group Jones Beene wrote:

New application today on USPTO

http://tinyurl.com/4w8r9

or if that doesn't work try

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=14&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1='amazon.com'&OS=

What I find a little surprising in the context of "timing," not just from this latest Mills patent application, but from a number of other recent claims by independent 'fringe' inventors, as well as papers from half a dozen Japanese Universities, (all claiming slightly different mechanisms) is a recent surge in the mention of the element *strontium* where excess energy anomalies are seen.

I hope your were able to parse that - as it begs for editing...

-------------

Mike Carrell writes: Fasten your seatbelts. This patent application has 716 claims and 695 clauses. It looks like the opening salvo of a major battle if the USPTO does not grant a patent. Unlike other Mills patent applications that may have been smacked down for conflicting with received opinion, this one is centered on applications and every possible variation on the themes already laid out on the BLP website. While device oriented, the language is general enough to read on virtually any attempt to implement the BLP reaction.

Sifting through all the claims is a significant task. The gas reactors are there, various modes of excitation, various energy collection schemes, the hydrino battery, etc. and etc. There are long paragraphs of citations and references.

Looks like things are getting interesting.

Thanks to Jones for flagging this one.

Jones is perhaps noticing that strontium is surfacing in the CF-LENR community, where an elegant experiment by Iwamura at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries showed unequivocal transmutation of strontium to molybdnum by diffusing deuterium gas through a thing film. The effect has been confirmed at Japanese and Italian labs. Strontium is also a BLP catalyst. If there is a deep connection, it is not evident yet. Iwamura also transmuted cesium to praseodymium.

Mike Carrell




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.