ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 276 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry
Posted on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 @ 22:08:39 UTC by vlad

Science Tony Craddock writes: A new Tom Bearden Technical Paper which corrects some major foundational science errors has now been posted on The Tom Bearden Website.

"...In electrodynamics, some scientists do recognize a grave foundations problem: That of the "source charge" and how it produces its associated fields... In 2003 we finally found the exact mechanism by which the source charge continuously consumes virtual state entropy of the vacuum and produces observable state negative entropy via its observable EM fields, potentials, and their energy...Some implications for electrical power engineering are pointed out."

See www.cheniere.org/techpapers

Note: a further reminder to those of you considering purchasing Tom Bearden books or DVDs as Christmas presents - Order Now to avoid disappointment.

Regards

Tony Craddock
Administrator
Cheniere Press
The Tom Bearden Website
www.cheniere.org

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry" | Login/Create an Account | 6 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 08:50:56 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
One of the most serious problems with all of the theories concerning ZPE is the lack of understanding as to the classification of the wave nature of the background flux. With little exception, all the theories present ZPE as a standard traveling oscillation when in fact all the experimental data indicate otherwise. One of the great mysteries of ZPE is its otherwise infinite density, which should not allow the Universe to exist at all as organized matter, and the existence of the universe tends to be a proven fact.
If in fact the ZPE were a traveling wave we would have been crushed out of existence in a planck unit of time.
To those that wish to appear knowledgeable about the theorectical nature of ZPE, I will offer one hint: the background flux is a standing wave, not a traveling wave. That means that it can be expressed as the resultant of two oscillations, much like the standing wave in an antenna is the combination of of an incident and reflected oscillation. Therein lies an even bigger mystery, what are the components of the ZPE that produce it in the first place?


  • Leyton geometry by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 20:45:31 UTC

Re: Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, December 06, 2003 @ 18:43:32 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
In the Intalek Yahoo group Gary Schasteen writes:

Bill,

Don't you have an overunity device that works on a small scale? I know that Tom Bearden does, when I contracted out the research and phase I development stage of the R&D project for my E.M.F.C. Electro-Magnetic Field Constrictor to Davison and Associates Research and Development Firm, they uncovered Tom Bearden's patent for a stationary electric generator, that pulled electricity from a dipole magnet. This part of their initial research into the feasibility of my own concept (not overunity).

His device is a working device, and the CEO of TAP-TEN Research had another device that he made that extracted enough electricity from two kitchen magnets to run a small walkman forever with nothing more then a welding rod, some copper wire, a capacitor, nails, two copper tubes, and stainless steel hinges to hold the rod. I have personally seen this device working for over a year. We also ruled out interference from the power lines, because the thing registered the same energy output no matter where we took the device.

So I know that such devices are possible because I have seen one working with my own two eyes. I know the CEO of TAP-TEN and he's a straight up fellow. That's enough for me to put my money in, I am sure that if you email the CEO of TAP-TEN Research, that he would be glad to give you instructions on how to replicate the experiment for yourself, the supplies are not that expensive, and you could probably round up most of them from around your house. This should be enough for you to, atleast, put together an experiment for yourself, so that you can see with your own two eyes, and in keeping with the scientific method, you can serve as a source of independent experimental verification, as is SOP for any scientific discovery or claim.

Regards,

Edwin

P.S. You may reach the CEO of TAP-TEN Research at:

groups.yahoo.com/group/tap-ten or at t12@scientist.com




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.