 |
There are currently, 276 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry
Posted on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 @ 22:08:39 UTC by vlad
|
|
Tony Craddock writes: A new Tom Bearden Technical Paper which corrects some major foundational science errors has now been posted on The Tom Bearden Website.
"...In electrodynamics, some scientists do recognize a grave foundations problem: That of the "source charge" and how it produces its associated fields... In 2003 we finally found the exact mechanism by which the source charge continuously consumes virtual state entropy of the vacuum and produces observable state negative entropy via its observable EM fields, potentials, and their energy...Some implications for electrical power engineering are pointed out."
See www.cheniere.org/techpapers
Note: a further reminder to those of you considering purchasing Tom Bearden books or DVDs as Christmas presents - Order Now to avoid disappointment.
Regards
Tony Craddock
Administrator
Cheniere Press
The Tom Bearden Website
www.cheniere.org
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 08:50:56 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | One of the most serious problems with all of the theories concerning ZPE is the lack of understanding as to the classification of the wave nature of the background flux. With little exception, all the theories present ZPE as a standard traveling oscillation when in fact all the experimental data indicate otherwise. One of the great mysteries of ZPE is its otherwise infinite density, which should not allow the Universe to exist at all as organized matter, and the existence of the universe tends to be a proven fact.
If in fact the ZPE were a traveling wave we would have been crushed out of existence in a planck unit of time.
To those that wish to appear knowledgeable about the theorectical nature of ZPE, I will offer one hint: the background flux is a standing wave, not a traveling wave. That means that it can be expressed as the resultant of two oscillations, much like the standing wave in an antenna is the combination of of an incident and reflected oscillation. Therein lies an even bigger mystery, what are the components of the ZPE that produce it in the first place? |
- Leyton geometry by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 20:45:31 UTC
|
|
Re: Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, December 06, 2003 @ 18:43:32 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | In the Intalek Yahoo group Gary Schasteen writes:
Bill,
Don't you have an overunity device that works on a small scale? I know that Tom Bearden does, when I contracted out the research and phase I development stage of the R&D project for my E.M.F.C. Electro-Magnetic Field Constrictor to Davison and Associates Research and Development Firm, they uncovered Tom Bearden's patent for a stationary electric generator, that pulled electricity from a dipole magnet. This part of their initial research into the feasibility of my own concept (not overunity).
His device is a working device, and the CEO of TAP-TEN Research had another device that he made that extracted enough electricity from two kitchen magnets to run a small walkman forever with nothing more then a welding rod, some copper wire, a capacitor, nails, two copper tubes, and stainless steel hinges to hold the rod. I have personally seen this device working for over a year. We also ruled out interference from the power lines, because the thing registered the same energy output no matter where we took the device.
So I know that such devices are possible because I have seen one working with my own two eyes. I know the CEO of TAP-TEN and he's a straight up fellow. That's enough for me to put my money in, I am sure that if you email the CEO of TAP-TEN Research, that he would be glad to give you instructions on how to replicate the experiment for yourself, the supplies are not that expensive, and you could probably round up most of them from around your house. This should be enough for you to, atleast, put together an experiment for yourself, so that you can see with your own two eyes, and in keeping with the scientific method, you can serve as a source of independent experimental verification, as is SOP for any scientific discovery or claim.
Regards,
Edwin
P.S. You may reach the CEO of TAP-TEN Research at:
groups.yahoo.com/group/tap-ten or at t12@scientist.com
|
|
|
|
|
