He made the remarks while answering questions from viewers during a recent episode of his Reality Check series, which focuses on unexplained phenomena and underreported stories.

In the discussion, he suggested the US may have quietly achieved breakthroughs in electrogravitic propulsion, a long theorised concept often linked to so called anti-gravity research. He also raised the possibility of an advanced energy system derived from zero-point energy, a hypothetical form of energy that exists in quantum vacuum states.

Rather than presenting hard proof, Coulthart framed his comments as informed speculation based on sources and patterns he claims to have observed during his investigative career. His remarks were widely shared online, with supporters praising his willingness to ask uncomfortable questions and critics accusing him of blurring the line between journalism and conjecture.

Electrogravitic propulsion refers to the idea that electrical fields could be used to counteract gravity, allowing craft to move without traditional engines or fuel. The concept dates back decades and is often associated with researcher T Townsend Brown, whose experiments were dismissed by many physicists as misinterpreted electrical effects rather than true anti gravity.

Zero point energy, meanwhile, is a real concept in quantum physics but remains purely theoretical as a practical power source. Mainstream science holds that while zero point energy exists at a microscopic level, there is no known way to harness it for propulsion or energy generation. This is why many scientists reject claims that any government has successfully developed such systems in secret.

Coulthart's comments quickly sparked heated debate online. Supporters argued that classified military projects have historically been hidden for decades and that advanced propulsion would fundamentally reshape society if revealed. Others questioned why no whistleblower has produced credible evidence if such technology truly exists.

Critics were far less forgiving. Some accused Coulthart of exaggeration, while others pointed to his journalistic background and urged audiences to separate fact from speculation.

One sceptical commenter argued that breakthroughs of this magnitude would be impossible to conceal indefinitely, especially in an era of global scientific collaboration. Others noted that discussions around anti-gravity often resurface during periods of heightened interest in unidentified aerial phenomena, only to fade when evidence fails to materialise.

So, is the US hiding a revolutionary anti-gravity or energy breakthrough? Based on publicly available evidence, there is no proof that such technology exists or has been successfully developed. Coulthart himself has not presented documents, data, or firsthand testimony that confirms his claims beyond probability and inference. Mainstream physicists continue to argue that known laws of physics do not support the feasibility of electrogravitic propulsion as described.

However, the persistence of these claims highlights a deeper issue. Public distrust in governments and secrecy around military research fuels speculation and suspicion. Until verified evidence emerges, Coulthart's claims remain unproven, sitting at the intersection of curiosity, conspiracy, and legitimate questions about transparency.

For now, the idea that the US is hiding an anti gravity breakthrough remains a compelling story rather than an established fact. It continues to intrigue audiences, provoke debate, and underline the enduring fascination with hidden technology and the possibility that humanity's understanding of physics may one day be turned on its head.

Source: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/us-hiding-anti-gravity-breakthrough-ross-coulthart-exposes-secret-energy-technology-1775902