ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 233 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The Yukawa's meson and the Higgs' boson
Posted on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 @ 20:02:30 UTC by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: In 1935 Yukawa published his theory of mesons, which explained the interaction between protons and neutrons, and was a major influence on research into elementary particles.

In 1949 he received the Nobel Prize in Physics, after the discovery by C. P. Powell, G. Occhialini, and C Lattes, of Yukawa's predicted pion in 1947.

According to Yukawa's idea, a meson would be jumping between two protons, so that the partnership proton+meson would play the role of a neutron.

Today the physicists know that the neutron has the quark structure (d,u,d), and the meson does not play any role within the structure of the neutron.


Therefore, in spite of he had predicted the existence of the meson, actually the meson does NOT play the role supposed originally by Yukawa.

Such "coincidence" is very significant, because it shows that in spite of a particle is predicted by a theory (because the author wrongly supposed that it plays some role in the Nature), but its detection does no mean the theory is correct, because the particle actually does not play that role imagined by the author.

In the case of Yukawa, he predicted the existence of a meson, but there are many other mesons existing in Nature.  Therefore the meson was detected by experiments because many other mesons exist (and so inevitably one among several mesons would be detected), and not because Yukawa predicted its existence.

Perhaps in the upcoming years we will see the repetition of a similar coincidence. Because today the physicists are trying to detect the Higgs boson, believing that such boson is responsible for the mass of particles.

And suppose that when the proton is broken in several particles, one of them is like predicted by Higgs theory.

But suppose that such particle does not play any role so that to give mass to the particles.

Well, then the particle will be detected in the Large Hadron Collider, and we will see a new  "coincidence" playing again its role: the physicists will be sure that such particle is the Higgs boson, and it is responsible for the mass of particles.

So, as already happened in the case of Yukawa's meson, it's possible we may see to repeat in upcoming years a similar coincidence: the physicists will credit to a particle (that has NOTHING to do with the mass of the particles), the property of giving mass to all the particles of the universe.


It seems God is playing a joke with the physicists.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"The Yukawa's meson and the Higgs' boson" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

OBSCURANTISM AT CERN ON "GOD'S PARTICLE"? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, December 18, 2011 @ 16:08:36 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
J. V. Kadeisvili
The Institute for Basic Research
Email: 
basicresearch [at] i-b-r [dot] org

Dear Colleagues,

The comparison of the CERN announcement of September 28, 2011 on superluminal neutrinos with the highly publicized press conference of December 12, 2011, "pre-announcing" the discovery of "God's particle" confirms what is known in informed scientific circles, namely, that there are at least two opposing factions at CERN:

A) A group of serious scientists interested in propelling scientific knowledge into the new frontiers of the 21st century that, to be "new," must be "beyond Einstein" as illustrated by superluminal neutrinos; and

B) A second group attempting to maintain 20th century lines for evident personal advantages (for non-experts, the Higgs boson is needed to maintain the validity of Einstein special relativity and the  the standard model throughout the entire particle physics and related large funds). The latter group is notoriously that of  "organized academic, financial and ethnic interests on Einstein" denounced by Prof. R. M.  Santilli in his Il Grande Grido of 1984 with three volumes of documentations, which works received in 1984 a supporting review by The Harvard Crimson and, subsequently, numerous positive reviews in newspapers around the world
http://www.scientificethics.org/IlGrandeGrido.htm [www.scientificethics.org]

In any case, no press conference "pre-announcing" a potential discovery of that magnitude is scientifically serious, particularly when considering preceding announcements by the CERN directorate that "no" evidence of the Higgs boson had emerged following the inspection of about 97% of the data. The "pre-announced" discovery should then be expected in a few events out of billions of recorded events with evident lack of  scientific credibility, thus raising serious shadows of obscurantism at CERN on the Higgs boson studiously manipulated by said interests via the abuse of over one billion dollars of public European-US money.

Since the United States of America has catastrophic financial problems growing at the rate of billions dollars per day, with consequential major financial problems throughout Europe and the rest of the world, responsible citizens, observers, scholars, governmental officers and politicians should have a moment of reflection before allowing organized interests on Einstein to use additional large public funds in the current so grave financial conditions, particularly when their outcome can be an obscurantism rather than any real scientific advance.

In the scientific reality outside organized interests on Einstein,  following fifty years of research on his Lie-admissible treatment of irreversible processes, the only one admitting invariance (predicting the same numerical values under the same conditions at different times), Prof. Santilli has proved beyond scientific or otherwise credible doubt that the very search for the Higgs boson has no solid scientific foundations for the following reasons (for technical details, see the references below):
...
This message shall also be available in the website
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/Announcments.html [www.santilli-foundation.org]




Re: The Yukawa's meson and the Higgs' boson (Score: 1)
by Koen on Monday, January 09, 2012 @ 12:47:52 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
Guglinski,  I like all your posts in this forum, keep up the good work!



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.