 |
There are currently, 233 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
|  |
The Yukawa's meson and the Higgs' boson
Posted on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 @ 20:02:30 UTC by vlad
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: In 1935 Yukawa published his theory of mesons, which explained the interaction between protons and neutrons, and was a major influence on research into elementary particles.
In 1949 he received the Nobel Prize in Physics, after the discovery by C. P. Powell, G. Occhialini, and C Lattes, of Yukawa's predicted pion in 1947.
According to Yukawa's idea, a meson would be jumping between two protons, so that the partnership proton+meson would play the role of a neutron.
Today the physicists know that the neutron has the quark structure (d,u,d), and the meson does not play any role within the structure of the neutron.
Therefore, in spite of he had predicted the existence of the meson,
actually the meson does NOT play the role supposed originally by Yukawa.
Such
"coincidence" is very significant, because it shows that in spite of a
particle is predicted by a theory (because the author wrongly supposed
that it plays some role in the Nature), but its detection does no mean
the theory is correct, because the particle actually does not play that
role imagined by the author.
In the case of Yukawa, he predicted the
existence of a meson, but there are many other mesons existing in
Nature. Therefore the meson was detected by experiments because many
other mesons exist (and so inevitably one among several mesons would be
detected), and not because Yukawa predicted its existence.
Perhaps
in the upcoming years we will see the repetition of a similar
coincidence. Because today the physicists are trying to detect the Higgs
boson, believing that such boson is responsible for the mass of
particles.
And suppose that when the proton is broken in several particles, one of them is like predicted by Higgs theory.
But suppose that such particle does not play any role so that to give mass to the particles.
Well,
then the particle will be detected in the Large Hadron Collider, and we
will see a new "coincidence" playing again its role: the physicists
will be sure that such particle is the Higgs boson, and it is
responsible for the mass of particles.
So, as already happened in
the case of Yukawa's meson, it's possible we may see to repeat in
upcoming years a similar coincidence: the physicists will credit to a particle (that has NOTHING to do with the mass of the particles), the property of giving mass to all the particles of the universe.
It seems God is playing a joke with the physicists.
|
| |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
OBSCURANTISM AT CERN ON "GOD'S PARTICLE"? (Score: 1) by vlad on Sunday, December 18, 2011 @ 16:08:36 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | J. V. Kadeisvili The Institute for Basic
Research Email: basicresearch [at] i-b-r [dot] org
Dear
Colleagues,
The comparison of the CERN announcement of September 28, 2011
on superluminal neutrinos with the highly publicized press conference of
December 12, 2011, "pre-announcing" the discovery of "God's particle" confirms
what is known in informed scientific circles, namely, that there are at least
two opposing factions at CERN:
A) A group of serious scientists
interested in propelling scientific knowledge into the new frontiers of the 21st
century that, to be "new," must be "beyond Einstein" as illustrated by
superluminal neutrinos; and
B) A second group attempting to maintain 20th
century lines for evident personal advantages (for non-experts, the Higgs boson
is needed to maintain the validity of Einstein special relativity and the the
standard model throughout the entire particle physics and related large funds).
The latter group is notoriously that of "organized academic, financial and
ethnic interests on Einstein" denounced by Prof. R. M. Santilli in his Il
Grande Grido of 1984 with three volumes of documentations, which works
received in 1984 a supporting review by The Harvard Crimson and,
subsequently, numerous positive reviews in newspapers around the world http://www.scientificethics.org/IlGrandeGrido.htm [www.scientificethics.org]
In
any case, no press conference "pre-announcing" a potential discovery of that
magnitude is scientifically serious, particularly when considering preceding
announcements by the CERN directorate that "no" evidence of the Higgs boson had
emerged following the inspection of about 97% of the data. The "pre-announced"
discovery should then be expected in a few events out of billions of recorded
events with evident lack of scientific credibility, thus raising serious
shadows of obscurantism at CERN on the Higgs boson studiously manipulated by
said interests via the abuse of over one billion dollars of public European-US
money.
Since the United States of America has catastrophic financial
problems growing at the rate of billions dollars per day, with consequential
major financial problems throughout Europe and the rest of the world,
responsible citizens, observers, scholars, governmental officers and politicians
should have a moment of reflection before allowing organized interests on
Einstein to use additional large public funds in the current so grave financial
conditions, particularly when their outcome can be an obscurantism rather than
any real scientific advance.
In the scientific reality outside organized
interests on Einstein, following fifty years of research on
his Lie-admissible treatment of irreversible processes, the only one
admitting invariance (predicting the same numerical values under the same
conditions at different times), Prof. Santilli has proved beyond scientific or
otherwise credible doubt that the very search for the Higgs boson has no
solid scientific foundations for the following reasons (for technical
details, see the references below): ... This message shall also be available in the website http://www.santilli-foundation.org/Announcments.html [www.santilli-foundation.org]
|
|
|
Re: The Yukawa's meson and the Higgs' boson (Score: 1) by Koen on Monday, January 09, 2012 @ 12:47:52 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla | Guglinski, I like all your posts in this forum, keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
|