 |
There are currently, 268 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Proof-of-Concept Experiment Results
Posted on Monday, May 12, 2003 @ 23:52:57 UTC by vlad
|
|
archer writes: As those who've been following Archer Enterprises' StarDrive Engineering Project news updates already know, we've recently been engaged in building and testing a full-scale experimental mock-up of the Primary Power System of our over-unity 24kW StarDrive Generator.
You over-unity engineering enthusiasts should be very pleased to know that the initial in-house testing we've just completed indicates our PoC experiment is a qualified but extremely encouraging success! For more information, please visit our company News page at stardrivedevice.com
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 1
Votes: 1
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Warning (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, May 13, 2003 @ 23:19:58 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | A general warning is in order. This site is for advocacy, discussion, and education. This site is [b]not[/b] here to provide investment advice. One might think, [blockquote]Well, it was discussed on ZPEnergy.com, and the consensus was X [i](the truth, a hoax, a scam)[/i], so it must be X.[/blockquote] but that thinking should only be taken so far. Not far enough to make an investment decision. Generally, everyone here wishes you well, hopes you make good investments, and don't get scammed; but nobody here takes any responsibility for any serious decisions made on the basis of their comments here.
Vlad, you sure can find them. Screen them you don't, but find them you do.
This site claims to have a reactionless propulsion device (in violation of conservation of momentum), and a free energy device (in violation of conservation of energy) that works because DC generators aren't harder to turn when they are under load (so work is not equal to force through distance). They are also special relativity skeptics. So these folks think that all of the known laws of physics are wrong. Surely they must have plenty of descriptions on their site that show the experiments they have done that disprove them, right? Wrong. No experimental results at all. Not even for the stardrive generator whose experimental results are the title of this article! So they must have them, but just not post them, right? Write them yourself, and see what they tell you.
Jim Giglio posted to the yahoo free energy list an experiment to test a reactionless drive. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free_energy/message/5547
Jerry Pournelle, commenting on his interaction with Dean sometime in
the early 60s, had this to say about how to test a device that's
supposed to violate the 3rd law:
> If anyone does have a candidate device for producing
> reactionless acceleration -- that is, linear acceleration
> without throwing mass overboard and without reacting with a
> medium such as air or water -- the first test is to suspend it
> on two wires attached so that the plane of the two wires is
> normal to the direction of thrust-- that is, make a swing and
> put your gadget on it facing in the normal direction of travel
> of the swing. Now turn it on. If it will hang non-vertically,
> get interested. Now cover it with a plastic garbage bag and see
> if it will still hang non-vertically. If it will still do so,
> turn it off, and if it settles to a vertical angle, and you can
> do this repeatedly, and it hasn't lost any mass during the
> experiments, call your local physics professor. Or call me.
> I'll take care of notifying the Swedish Academy. But until it
> will do that, I don't need to look at it.
|
|
|
|
|
