SYNCOPETRA announces its dsicovery
Posted on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 @ 15:21:47 UTC by vlad
|
|
 Posted on KeelyNet_Interact list: SYNCOPETRA is now able to make 2 different pure magnet motors, free energy generators, and linear magnet motors. This capability comes from the discovery of the true mechanisms of electric motors. Interesting enough, we will only make one each of all but one these devices solely for experimental purposes.
Reasoning for this decision is very simple. The real prize, just like in semiconductors, is a field effect device/motor, a device where torque is developed by powering a field coil rather than a rotor coil. The main justifying advantages leading to this decision are easier speed and torque control and the least quantity of permanent magnets. The only negative is that control is very high Q with control and limited over a range of about 10% of the ideal current. An astute motor builder might see an analogy between this effect and the slippage in an AC induction ('squirrel cage') motor.
Our discovery unravels the enigma in the conflict between Faraday's force on a wire and Newton's equal an opposite reaction. More accurately the forces are on the near pole face edges. Faraday's equation, applied to the induction AC or the field coil DC motor, can be (but hardly ever is) written as:
Torque = constant x field current (Ic) x rotor current (Ir).
Forces are on the wires with the enigmatic question being, 'HOW can the forces be EQUAL if the currents are UNEQUAL?' The exact same flux is produced with equal currents of the value = square root of Ic x Ir. (Please note currents are scalar values and equations are not mathematical vector cross products.)
Our first discovery starts with magnetic flux, maybe exactly like light, is refracted at boundaries. The air analogy is supported by the fact that laminations polarize flux and thereby carry significantly more flux, more easily, than solid steel. Since the permeability of air and steel are proportioned approximately 1000:1, Snell's refraction law would indicate that; no matter what incidence angle is in steel, the incidence angle in air is perpendicular. Polarization and refraction may be inherently interrelated. Experimental proof of this discovery is easy, cheap, and available to the public.
Our second discovery is a alternative way to generate motor gap shear forces. Faraday's forces inherently involve changing reluctance and conserved energy. Sacrificing half of Faraday's forces results in constant reluctance, i.e. NO back EMF!!!!! This discovery was somewhat accidental, has proved to be absolutely incredible, and will soon be recognized as the source of free energy. Very simply, reluctance/induction motors utilize repulsive shear forces and the alternative is our invention of a tractive shear force mechanism.
Our experimental results support conclusions:
1. Magnet motors can make free energy practically only if they are narrow gap devices.
2. All motors are driven by circumferential shear forces rather than pure torque. If our theories are correct, motor forces must be independent shear forces. Narrow gap experimental proof exists with large torque being generated between two parallel and aligned magnets.
Torque is essentially dependent on only the separation distance between the magnets when tractive shear is produced with constant gaps. 3. If shear forces are independent linear propulsion is possible. A video of proof is immanent. We move a steel bar between two magnets. Of course there are end effects, but they are only seen within one magnet length from both ends of the bar. An infinitely long bar has no end effects.
4. If linear propulsion is possible a rotary motor merely simulates the infinitely long bar with an annular loop of steel.
5. Cheap U-coil field motors are significantly less efficient than motors with coils at the pole face. This effect is explain by equations which further support the case for refraction and is the basis for field effect motor.
I am Vilma Cinco, that's my plan and my story, and I am sticking with both. That is, of course, unless some can top the incredible experiments that I have witnessed.
We would gladly debate our findings with anyone and with one simple rule of engagement. Debaters may use any equations but may not use any nonsense from the rubbish pile. I have witnessed the debate several times and; without theoretical nonsense including mutual inductance, back EMF, rotating field, and more; debaters seem to have been 'naked as a jay bird' when the opposition is armored with a couple of simple equations. Most notable, F=MA has an equivalent, irrefutable, equation in the art of magnetics: I= flux quantity x reluctance.
Enjoy, participate, or ignore,
Vilma G. Cinco
SYNCOPETRA
===================
Site (Videos) on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/syncopetra
A page on Syncopetra Motor was created at PESWiki:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Syncopetra_Motor
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
