 |
There are currently, 245 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
The flow of money and radical new ideas
Posted on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 @ 21:50:44 UTC by vlad
|
|
PJW, Dr. writes: Kiril has been saying, roughly: The mainstream which controls the flow of money has been grossly intolerant of new ideas, and irresponsible about the need to find new energy technologies at a time when the very survival of humanity is threatened. Their irresponsibility is heavily based on irrational factors like ego and greed and decisions based on unthinking, irrational prejudices of all kinds.
Some on this list have quoted Michio Kaku lately. If Kaku were asked his opinion, he might possibly say: We in the mainstream do need to work harder to be open to the future. But some things are clearly impossible, according to our best knowledge today, which is not just a matter of prejudice or personal opinion. For example, we really know that perpetual motion machines are impossible. This Chukanov proposal is in that category. The arguments on the web page are very, very far from what it would take to justify funding, compared with many other new ideas denied funding every day because of a lack of overall funding. There are humanitarian reasons why he should be funded, but the truth is that there are thousands of scientists and engineers losing tenure and forced into economic desperation every day because of the overall lack of funding in the United States today.
Myself, I am not Kaku or Kiril. Looking at it all from a very distant perspective -- "as if from Mars" -- my first impression is that both sides are right, in a way, when they complain about the failings of the other. The net effect is extremely depressing, and I do not have a simple solution to offer for the psychological/social tangle we are caught in. My view of Kiril's web page is not based on the same analysis that Kaku might give, but for various complex reasons I do not see any real basis as yet for arguing with their bottom line. Likewise, my view of the mainstream is more complex, but a complex, constipated tangle ... is not yet doing what needs to be done, and the bottom line still is very, very daunting.
But.. time does not permit me to say much more right now.
Best of luck,
Paul
------------
Kiril Chukanov writes: Hi All,
I just came back home from my lab – again today I produced 8 times over-unity on my ANLAUTRON-4. If Kaku/Kuku doesn’t believe in the violation of Law of Energy Conservation he can come to my lab in Calgary, put $10,000 (his fine for disbelieving), and then let measure the input and output power.
Here the over-unity is not some few percents, you can measure 800%. ANLAUTRON-IV can produce even though more over-unity but it can destroy itself.
Law of Energy Conservation is formulated two centuries ago (?) by physician not by physicist. This law is verified in normal conditions and it works all the time. But if you can make a quantum macro-object (ball lightning) you’ll be very surprised to see that this fundamental law of physics is violated in positive direction.
I know how to create ball lightning in continuous regime and how to activate it. Then – the rest is measurement. There exist two ways of activation of this unusual macro-object and I know how to use them.
Before N. Copernicus official science/religion claimed (as proven truth) that the sun is rotating around Earth. Another accepted as “final proven truth” in physics is the Law of Gravity. This fundamental law is also violated in some particular quantum conditions. There exists no “dark matter”; there exists violation of Law of Gravity for some large scale cosmic formations. I described this fact in my books.
Conventional scientists like M.Kuku built their career on accepted as “final” physical dogmas and they cannot psychologically accept another reality. Conventional scientists are confined forever in the closed universe of contemporary official science. They are unable to “see” beyond the boundaries of this scientific universe.
For obvious reason (I’m working for business – my investors don’t care about science, they care to have Free Energy generators) I cannot disclose everything in my web-site. Also my investors are not so stupid and so naïve to believe 100% in my claims – they are presenting on the tests, they bring with them specialists. However, it is very hard for one person to advance very fast – that’s my big problem now.
I understand that my discovery will change the things in the world drastically. I understand that Big Oil and Big Capital will fight fiercely this not to happen. I understand that I’m still alive because They still don’t believe me. I understand that the Big Fox (US government connected to the Big Oil) is taking care about chickens (regular American consumers). I understand that QFE will destroy monopoly of the Big Oil and the Big Capital and will make the gap between Rich and Middle class/Poor class smaller and smaller. In scientific plan QFE will destroy old scientific dogmas and will open the way of New Physics.
If somebody of you wants to verify the over-unity on ANLAUTRON-IV – put $10,000, sing a non-disclosure agreement and welcome to my lab.
Best regards,
Kiril Chukanov
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
The exotic research of Tom Valone (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, April 19, 2008 @ 12:26:51 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | William Alek writes: Hello all,
I'm doing the show live at the X-Conference near Washington DC, and my guest this week is a speaker at this conference, Dr. Tom Valone: http://www.integrity-research.org/
Tom is the President of Integrity Research Institute and Editor of the well respected Future Energy newsletter and Enews. He has authored 6 books and numerous scientific studies, articles and papers related to energy in all forms. He provides consultations on electrical product design/development, engineering testing, environmental/electromagnetic field/energy, expert testimony and opinion. He meets regularly with congressional and senate leaders and briefs them on the latest energy developments. His views regarding energy-related matters have been featured on national media including CNN.
This is next on the PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR.
Brought to you by Vortex Network News.
Bill
---
William S. Alek, INTALEK, INC.
7760 E. State Rte 69, Ste C5-381
Prescott Valley, AZ 86314
PHONE: 928.255.0198
URL: http://www.intalek.com/
|
|
|
Re: The flow of money and radical new ideas (Score: 1)
by rputman (rich dot putman at g mail dot comEDY) on Monday, April 21, 2008 @ 13:56:40 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://tinyurl.com/2w9ytu | I expect that most readers of zpenergy understand well the significance
of an over unity energy breakthrough.
Achieving that goal would make SUCH a difference for Earth that I've
suggested to Congress that the federal government establish a win-win
entrepreneurial competition with substantial prizes. Perhaps $100
million for first place, $80 million for second place, $60 million for
third place, and $25 million for fourth through eighth place. The
competition would have specific criteria which could be scored, such as:
- total energy that could be produced, with a
fully-implemented system.
- any adverse impact on the environment (e.g. ethanol uses so
much water it lowers water tables)
- geographical independence
- associated capital expenses
- physical space required for the generation device (smaller
scores higher)
- long term reliability
- long term availability
- security of the system (widely distributed scores higher
than centralized)
- cost per kwh has to be DRAMATICALLY less to score
well
- independence from the weather conditions (e.g. a day may be
overcast or rainy or there may be no wind)
Such a contest would be win-win because payment would only be made to
breakthroughs that met minimum score requirements.
As has been pointed out before on this site and in this thread, there
are formidable obstacles to getting funding for an over unity energy
breakthrough. But to succeed in that effort, we don't need to influence
a large number of people. We need to influence some key people. I'll
give you a example that comes from my home state of MN. It comes from a
company that is normally very innovative - 3M. Since I have no
relationship with 3M, I can't give you the exact story; but I can give
you the essence of it - which is what's important.
As you probably know, one of 3M's great strengths is in the field of
adhesives. There was one research project that didn't quite pan out.
The adhesive they were working on just wasn't strong enough. But one of
the people on the project thought about a simple application for this
adhesive "failure" - an application that would solve a problem that
bugged his church choir. The choir members used little slips of paper
to mark where the hymns were that they would be singing. Problem: the
little slips easily fell out of the hymnals and onto the floor. Pain in
the neck. What if they used little slips with this weak adhesive on the
back to mark the various places in the hymnals? Worked great!
Thinking of many other possible uses for such slips, the people on the
research project felt they had latched onto a significant new market.
But their superiors in management, didn't agree. So the researchers did
some very clever gorilla marketing. They gave samples of their little
slips with the weak adhesive to executive secretaries all around the
company. The secretaries LOVED the little slips with the weak adhesive.
They found all kinds of uses for them. When they ran out, they told the
people they worked for, "We need more; we want more; we demand more!"
And thus, the viability of 3M post it notes was proven within 3M,
and the product grew to become a huge success story.
What's needed to transform the goal of an over unity energy
breakthrough into reality is a key individual or small group of key
individuals who are willing to carry the ball - champion the goal. The
factor of money being paid out ONLY for proven success should appeal to any person with a practical mind.
Make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
