ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 208 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

An answer to the 'cosmic coincidence'?
Posted on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 @ 21:11:53 UTC by vlad

Science by Ker Than/ Cosmos Online

NEW YORK: The late formation of rocky planets might explain a vexing cosmological coincidence about why intelligent life has evolved precisely at a relatively exciting point of the universe's history.

During the past ten years, cosmologists have determined the age and composition of the universe to unprecedented precision: the universe is nearly 14 billion years old and is made mostly out of 'vacuum energy', which is making the expansion of the universe accelerate.

The theory goes that empty space isn't really empty, but rather filled with virtual particles constantly popping in and out of existence. All this activity imparts energy to empty space, termed vacuum energy.



Stepping on the gas

Vacuum energy itself acts like a kind of anti-gravity pushing space-time apart. Calculations suggest that only when the density of this vacuum energy is larger than the density of matter in the universe will the expansion of space-time accelerate – but this is what we are currently observing.

The cosmic coincidence is that we are living at precisely the time when vacuum energy is starting to dominate. This drives some experts crazy because statistically, there's less than a one per cent chance that this would be the case. Why, they ask, is this momentous event happening now, precisely when humans are alive to witness it?

It's as if someone has just stepped on the accelerator of the universe, claim Charles Lineweaver and Charles Egan, astronomers at the Australian National University in Canberra and the University of New South Wales in Sydney, respectively.

In order to explain this so-called 'cosmic coincidence' problem, some scientists have proposed the idea of a 'multiverse', where different parts of the universe have different values of the vacuum energy.

This doesn't sit well with everyone, however, because it implies that physical laws can differ in different parts of the universe, and that what holds true for our corner of the cosmos might not be applicable in a different part.

"There is no coincidence"

As an alternative, Lineweaver and Egan suggest that the cosmic coincidence problem can be solved if scientists take the evolution of terrestrial planets into account. According to a new model the pair has developed, rocky planets – and the intelligent beings that inhabit them – can only exist relatively late in the universe's history.

"Our existence as observers, and probably the existence of any observers in the universe depends on the existence of terrestrial planets," Lineweaver said.

Their model, detailed in a recent issue of Astrophysical Journal, suggests that the complicated chain of events which includes the formation of heavy elements in stars, their dispersion in supernova explosions, the formation of planetary systems, and finally the evolution of intelligent beings requires several billion years.

The model predicts that about 70 per cent of the observers in the universe will live during a time when the vacuum energy dominates. "Taking this into account makes the cosmic coincidence disappear," Lineweaver said. "There is no coincidence."

Lawrence Krauss, a theorist at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, U.S., said he is skeptical of the new findings because it assumes that humans are a typical example of intelligent life in the universe. "We do not know that we are typical of all life in our universe, or any universe," he said.

Source: http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1845


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 3.5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"An answer to the 'cosmic coincidence'?" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: An answer to the 'cosmic coincidence'? (Score: 1)
by Koen on Thursday, February 14, 2008 @ 07:39:02 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
This is called the 'anthropological principle':   everything is the way it is, because we exist. All physics aspects are such that it 'enables' intelligent life. Change one aspect a little bit, and the result is a cosmos (or not even that) that could not support life.

But is this principle 'physics'?  No, it is metaphysics.

The 'cosmic coincidence' is mainly an after thought of a non-deterministic quantum physical "early phase of the Big Bang".
The very early big bang was a micro-physical process and according to quantum mechanics theory  this event was  also non-deterministic.
Another after thought is that our cosmos CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD, because of the non-deterministic nature of the big bang. This means "the end of physics, as a science".

Of course,  quantum physics (and GR)  might not be the best theoretical basis for physics in the first place, so all the meta-physical after thoughts as a consequence of GR and QM  can be totally wrong as well.

For instance,  jack Sarfatti adopted Bohm's deterministic interpretation of the Schrödinger equation solutions.  And if you really want to understand the origins of  QMs  "strangeness", please study the great work of dr. Werner Hofer:
http://web.ssci.liv.ac.uk/~whofer/md.html





Re: An answer to the 'cosmic coincidence'? (Score: 1)
by malc on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 @ 00:38:07 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
Iv'e been reading a lot of articles these days about this "coincidence" that troubles physicists. What complete bollocks. Sorry to swear but these folks are mindless morons looking to perpetuate their incomes by theorising about NOTHING!

Here's something can neither be proved nor disproved but is entirely feasible:

10 billion years ago, life (but not as we know it - quote star trek) living on a hot gaseous planet theorised that it is very concidental that the universe supports life since in a few billion years time it will be mostly cold barren rocks.........DUH!!!

Here's another thing to think about:

There are as many suns in a galazy as grains of sand on all the worlds beaches. Likewise, there are as many galazies as grains of sand on all the beaches. We have not even visited an adjacent grain on a grain! and come to all these conclusions about life in the universe.......DUMB DUMB DUMB and arrogant beyond comprehension.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.