ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 787 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 12, 2026 - August 16, 2026) TeslaTech Annual Conference 2026

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel'
    Posted on Monday, February 04, 2008 @ 21:19:15 UTC by vlad

    General Sepp Hasslberger writes: Peak oil is repeatedly coming up in discussions as a scenario that is widely accepted.

    It seems that the "we are running out of oil" mantra is just so much hot air vented by the friends of a very profitable industry that extracts and sells oil.

    While that scenario and the high price of oil is a welcome stimulus for the development of alternative technologies, we should realize that it is not based on fact. A recent scientific mission discovered evidence for the continuous production of hydrocarbons in the earth's mantle that we should be aware of as a group.


    Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel'

    New evidence supports premise that Earth produces endless supply


    Kind regards
    Sepp

    		 
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about General
    · News by vlad
    Most read story about General:
    Z machine melts diamond to puddle


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel'" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    The Peak Oil Deception: Squeezing Energy for Profit (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Saturday, February 16, 2008 @ 12:54:37 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Sepp Hasslberger writes: While energy needs are set to grow inexorably for the next decades, production of hydrocarbon fuels is being throttled down to a trickle. The resulting shortage finds us - the consumers of energy - at a distinct disadvantage. We are paying the price for not paying attention. The Peak Oil scenario was first announced in 1956 by a petroleum geologist - M. King Hubbert - who was at the time working for the Shell Oil company. Hubbert's prediction was that oil production would peak in the US between 1965 and 1970 and that internationally, the peak of production would be reached around the year 2000. Hubbert's peak, as the inexorable winding down of oil production has also been named, is...

    More: http://blog.hasslberger.com/2008/02/the_peak_oil_deception_squeezi.html [blog.hasslberger.com]



    Re: Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel' (Score: 1)
    by RBM on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 @ 16:17:15 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Sepp Hasslberger, who is ... ? Abiotic petroleum Ha, Ha Ha,

    Previous posters have hit the high points that crtique this 'news'.

    I'm not even gong  to search who in the wold is Sepp and what his agenda minght be.

    But if one is totally naive about abiotic oil search theoildrum and the subject and be prepared for an avalanche.

    News, portal ,,, huh ?



    Re: Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel' (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 @ 10:38:06 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    Oil prices did not collapse as a result of this story, which has been around for a while. They will continue to increase as reserves deplete, and demand increases.


    Abiotic petroleum has some basis in fact, but is not the origin of the petroleum we are sucking out of the ground today. There has never been a petroleum deposit that bears the signature of an abiotic origin.

    Read carefully into Golds theory, and you'll see that these hydrocarbons, if they exist, occur in very small densities very deep in the earths crust.

    About the only endless supply we seem to have occuring on Earth is the supply of mendacityand distortion coming out of the mass media.

    World Net Daily? The Internet Version of the Supermarket Tabloid!




    Re: Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel' (Score: 1)
    by malc on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 @ 01:21:51 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
    Could well be. However what is the rate of production?  If its very low then it would still take millions of years to produce the quantities that we burn and thus the method of oil generation is mute. It is still essentially "fossil". It can only be non fossil if the quantities generated are high enough to be a viable source.

    This in no way means I agree with using it as a fuel source though. It seems to me that the earth has been stablising for millions of years in order to be in the balance it currently is.  This balance has sustained "life as we know it" i.e us. So to then re-release those locked up hydrocarbons is exceptionally dumb. You have to be really really stupid to think undoing millions of years of earth chemistry will have no affect! But then again we mess with nature all the time and wonder why disasters happen DUH!

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.