ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 215 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Gravity, Electrostatics, and the Reversal Threshold
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 @ 06:30:05 UTC by rob

Science FDT writes: Every attempt to unite gravity and electricity into one single unified theory has foundered on the issue of how to reconcile a theory in which like charges are mutually attractive, with a theory in which like charges are mutually repulsive.

Maxwell had the solution within his grasp but he failed to see it. Maxwell's 1861 paper, 'On Physical Lines of Force',

http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/maxwell_oplf.pdf

actually contains two distinct but overlapping theories working together in tandem, but Maxwell failed to segregate these two theories. Had he done so, he might have seen the link between gravity and electrostatics.

In part I, Maxwell was dealing with a hydrodynamical theory involving a liquid aether of unknown substance. In aether hydrodynamics, like negative charges are mutually attractive. Gravity is based on aether hydrodynamics.

In part III, Maxwell was dealing with an elastic polarization theory involving a sea of electrical particles. These electrical particles were introduced in part II in order to give stability to the concept of a sea of aether vortices, and in order to link magnetic fields to electric current. Polarization and magnetization of this electric sea leads to a theory of electromagnetism in which like charges repel.

The hydrodynamical aether theory and the elastic electric sea theory operate together in tandem. It all comes down to the question of dominance in any given situation. Hence, two negatively charged bodies may mutually attract or mutually repel depending on the overall circumstances.

When we study the planets in motion around the sun, we are dealing unequivocally with aether hydrodynamics and so like charges attract. When we study a Faraday cage, we are dealing unequivocally with elastic discharge in the electric sea and so like charges repel. However, the two theories are both very much linked by the aether.

The confusion arises in situations in which the boundary between the two theories becomes somewhat obscured. In the theory of atomic bonding, the mutual attraction which ought to be clearly attributable to aether hydrodynamics, has been mistakenly explained in the context of like charges being mutually repulsive. Hence in order to justify the ionic bonds existing in a sodium chloride lattice, a preliminary transaction is introduced.

A sodium atom sailing close to a chlorine atom sights it and takes an interest in it. It casts out a mooring electron over into the chlorine atom and the two can then haul themselves together. This explanation masks out the fact that the mutual attraction has already occurred before the official explanation for the mutual attraction has come into existence.

See 'Gravity Reversal and Atomic Bonding' at,

http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe6.pdf

Gravity is electrostatics in circumstances in which the reversal threshold has not yet kicked in. The reversal threshold is caused by solenoidal polarization of the electric sea.

It's purely a matter of semantics as to whether we want to attribute atomic bonding to gravity or to electrostatics. The important thing is that we use the hydrodynamical rules of mutual attraction as opposed to the elastic polarization rules of mutual repulsion.

Yours sincerely, David Tombe


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by rob


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Gravity, Electrostatics, and the Reversal Threshold" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

"Every attempt to unite gravity and electricity..." (Score: 1)
by volantis (zpenergy2@16pi2.com) on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 @ 03:59:27 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.16pi2.com
The Aether Physics Model successfully and mathematically unites gravity and electricity.  In the Aether Physics Model, gravity is demonstrated to be orthogonal to electricity as mass is orthogonal to strong charge. 

http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
http://www.16pi2.com/files/Calculations_UFT.pdf



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.