ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 748 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Gravity, Electrostatics, and the Reversal Threshold
    Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 @ 06:30:05 UTC by rob

    Science FDT writes: Every attempt to unite gravity and electricity into one single unified theory has foundered on the issue of how to reconcile a theory in which like charges are mutually attractive, with a theory in which like charges are mutually repulsive.

    Maxwell had the solution within his grasp but he failed to see it. Maxwell's 1861 paper, 'On Physical Lines of Force',

    http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/maxwell_oplf.pdf

    actually contains two distinct but overlapping theories working together in tandem, but Maxwell failed to segregate these two theories. Had he done so, he might have seen the link between gravity and electrostatics.

    In part I, Maxwell was dealing with a hydrodynamical theory involving a liquid aether of unknown substance. In aether hydrodynamics, like negative charges are mutually attractive. Gravity is based on aether hydrodynamics.

    In part III, Maxwell was dealing with an elastic polarization theory involving a sea of electrical particles. These electrical particles were introduced in part II in order to give stability to the concept of a sea of aether vortices, and in order to link magnetic fields to electric current. Polarization and magnetization of this electric sea leads to a theory of electromagnetism in which like charges repel.

    The hydrodynamical aether theory and the elastic electric sea theory operate together in tandem. It all comes down to the question of dominance in any given situation. Hence, two negatively charged bodies may mutually attract or mutually repel depending on the overall circumstances.

    When we study the planets in motion around the sun, we are dealing unequivocally with aether hydrodynamics and so like charges attract. When we study a Faraday cage, we are dealing unequivocally with elastic discharge in the electric sea and so like charges repel. However, the two theories are both very much linked by the aether.

    The confusion arises in situations in which the boundary between the two theories becomes somewhat obscured. In the theory of atomic bonding, the mutual attraction which ought to be clearly attributable to aether hydrodynamics, has been mistakenly explained in the context of like charges being mutually repulsive. Hence in order to justify the ionic bonds existing in a sodium chloride lattice, a preliminary transaction is introduced.

    A sodium atom sailing close to a chlorine atom sights it and takes an interest in it. It casts out a mooring electron over into the chlorine atom and the two can then haul themselves together. This explanation masks out the fact that the mutual attraction has already occurred before the official explanation for the mutual attraction has come into existence.

    See 'Gravity Reversal and Atomic Bonding' at,

    http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe6.pdf

    Gravity is electrostatics in circumstances in which the reversal threshold has not yet kicked in. The reversal threshold is caused by solenoidal polarization of the electric sea.

    It's purely a matter of semantics as to whether we want to attribute atomic bonding to gravity or to electrostatics. The important thing is that we use the hydrodynamical rules of mutual attraction as opposed to the elastic polarization rules of mutual repulsion.

    Yours sincerely, David Tombe


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by rob


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 2


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Gravity, Electrostatics, and the Reversal Threshold" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    "Every attempt to unite gravity and electricity..." (Score: 1)
    by volantis (zpenergy2@16pi2.com) on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 @ 03:59:27 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.16pi2.com
    The Aether Physics Model successfully and mathematically unites gravity and electricity.  In the Aether Physics Model, gravity is demonstrated to be orthogonal to electricity as mass is orthogonal to strong charge. 

    http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
    http://www.16pi2.com/files/Calculations_UFT.pdf



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.