ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 208 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

PLUMBING THE ELECTRON'S DEPTHS
Posted on Friday, June 30, 2006 @ 22:29:30 UTC by vlad

Science Careful observation of a single electron in an atom trap over a period of several months has resulted in the best measurement yet of the electron's magnetic moment and an improved value for alpha, the fine structure constant, the parameter which sets the overall strength of the electromagnetic force. Electrons are of course a part of every atom and as such are a basic building block of the universe. And alpha is an important member of the system of fundamental constants used to describe nature.

The electron, much lighter than a proton and generally thought to be a pointlike particle, is about as fundamental an object for study as one can have in physics. Nevertheless, the electron's interaction with the vacuum is anything but simple. The theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) predicts that an electron is perpetually grappling with virtual particles---such as photons and electron-positron pairs---emerging briefly from the surrounding vacuum. In the absence of these interactions, the magnetic moment of the electron (referred to by the letter g), which relates the size of the electron's magnetism to its intrinsic spin, would have a value of 2. But direct measurements of g show that it is slightly different from 2. The finer these measurements become, the better one can probe the quantum nature of electrons and QED itself. Furthermore, if the electron had structure (in the way that protons, for instance, are made of quarks), this too would show up in measurements of g.

To gain the greatest possible control over the electron and its environment, Gerald Gabrielse and his students Brian Odom and David Hanneke at Harvard create a macroscopic artificial atom consisting of a single electron executing an endless looping trajectory within a trap made of charged electrodes---a central, positively-charged electrode and two negatively-charged electrodes above and below--- supplemented by coils producing a magnetic field. The combined electric and magnetic forces keep the electron in its circular "cyclotron"orbit. In addition to this planar motion, the electron wobbles up and down in the vertical direction, in the direction of the magnetic field. The heart of the Harvard experiment is to explore these two motions---the circular motion, which conforms to quantum rules, and the vertical motion, which conforms to classical physics---in a new way.

First the quantum part. Like any real atom, this artificial atom is under the sway of quantum rules, and the captive electron can only possess certain permitted energies. Electrons have been bound in traps like this before, but this new experiment is the first to be laid out so that the electron can reside in its very lowest quantum-allowed cyclotron states. The apparatus does this by controlling stray energy, such as by inhibiting blackbody heating of the electron by cooling the central enclosure to a temperature of 100 mK and by inhibiting emission by the electron itself through clever design of the atom trap cavity. The whole setup is acting as a one-electron quantum cyclotron.

Second, the classical part. The Harvard experiment is the first to induce a microscopic object to adjust its own oscillations based on interactions with its environment (see their publication of a year ago: D'Urso et al., Physical Review Letters, 25 March 2005). The electron, as it moves vertically, induces a very tiny voltage change in the external electrical circuit supplying the electrodes. Sensing this change, the circuit can adjust the electrode voltage to enhance or depress the electron's up-and-down excursions. This feedback-actuated self-excitation, if it's not too big or too small, allows the researchers to measure an oscillation frequency which in turn is related to the electron's quantum state.

It is this masterful control over the electron's motions and the ability to measure the energy levels of the electron's artificial quantum environment that allows the Harvard group to improve the measurement of g by a factor of 6 over previous work. The new uncertainty in the value, set forth in an upcoming article in Physical Review Letters, is now at the level of 0.76 parts per trillion. No less important than g is alpha. By inserting the new value of g into QED equations, and thanks to improved QED calculations of very high accuracy, the experimenters and theorists together determined a new value for alpha, one with an accuracy ten times better than available from any other method. This is the first time a more precise value of alpha has been reported since 1987. The new alpha, published in a companion article in Physical Review Letters, has an uncertainty of 0.7 parts per billion.

The measured value of g can also be used to address the issue of hypothetical electron constituents. Such subcomponents, the new g measurement shows, could be no lighter than 130 GeV. On the basis of this experiment one can also place a corresponding limit on the size of the electron; it must be no larger than 10^-18 m across. These are not necessarily the best experimental limits on the size or structure of the electron, but this is, after all, work that is patently in the realm of low-temperature atomic physics and not the realm of high-energy particle accelerators, where fundamental particle properties are normally measured.

The Harvard atom trap effort has spanned twenty years and has yielded more than half a dozen PhDs. According to Gabrielse (gabrielse@physics.harvard, 617-495-4381), an improved value for alpha should (among other things) contribute to the pending adjustment of fundamental constants aimed at redefining the kilogram in a way that avoids the use of an actual weight kept under glass in Paris. (Odom et al., and Gabrielse et al., two upcoming articles in Physical Review Letters, lab website at http://hussle.harvard.edu/~gabrielse/ )

Source: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 783 June 30, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"PLUMBING THE ELECTRON'S DEPTHS" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.