ZPEnergy.com - The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field

David Tombe writes: Dear Sir, I was interested to see that you support the idea of an electron positron dielectric. Check out this web link to obtain a more accurate double helix structure for it.

Yours sincerely
David Tombe

Abstract. Maxwell’s 1861 paper ‘On Physical Lines of Force’ (parts I to III) is interpreted, and an improvement is proposed which involves replacing his vortex cells with rotating electron positron dipoles. The cause of magnetism is then explained in terms of a vortex sea of electron positron
dipoles, in which magnetic field lines are comprised of helical springs created out these dipoles. The electron positron dipoles are bonded together in a double helix pattern and the resulting helical springs close on themselves in elliptical or circular solenoidal hoops.

James Clerk-Maxwell published his paper 'On Physical Lines of Force' in 1861 in the Philosophical Magazine [1].
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf

The Interpretation
I. In part I of his 1861 paper ‘On Physical Lines of Force’ [1], Maxwell proposes that magnetism can be explained by the pressure differential between the axial and the equatorial planes of a vortex sea, in which the vortices are aligned along their axial plane, and all rotating in the same direction. He considers that a tension exists in the axial plane, and that a centrifugal pressure exists in the equatorial plane. He justifies his proposal by introducing the equations of mechanical equilibrium and combining them with his vortex theory of pressure differential, and showing that such an arrangement would explain the mathematics of some important aspects of magnetism. In doing so, equation (1) in Maxwell’s paper gives us the relationship between density and magnetic permeability, which proves to be of ultimate importance in the final conclusion of his work, when he carries this result forward into equation (132) of part III. Maxwell attempts to reconcile his mathematical results with his physical model, and he arrives at some interesting explanations. He explains the alignment of a bar magnet in a magnetic field in terms of differential axial tension in his vortex columns, giving rise to a torque.

Source for the paper: http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe.pdf


Create an account	Home · Topics · Downloads · Your Account · Submit News · Top 10


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.