ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 432 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Current Poll Results

    Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?

    yes64 %64 %64 % 64.81% (35)
    no35 %35 %35 % 35.19% (19)

    Total Votes: 54


    [ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

    [ Go Back ]

    Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

     To break-through, an OU device needs an acceptable theory. (138 votes)

     What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (79 votes)

     What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

     Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (144 votes)

     The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (103 votes)


    "Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so polluted by quacks?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 04:14:06 UTC

    There is a significant difference between the research field into ZPE and the amateur experiments with supposed ZPE effects. My answer is based on those who are researching or theorising about ZPE.

    I suspect that Karn was directing his usual narrow minded attack against the amateur experimentor. There is no doubt that this would attract a lot of scam merchants but no more so than a computer with an internet connection ! The problem is that the likes of Karn are so dismissive of ZPE possibilities that there will be a lot of highly respected people who avoid the subject for fear of ridicule (and their pay packets ). Yet, since NO-ONE actually fully understands the vacuum & gravity & inertia etc then clearly no possibilities can yet be honestly discounted.

    Malcolm


    Re: Do you agree with Karn that the ZPE research field is so (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 16:36:59 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    The number of cranks, quacks, and downright frauds in this field comprises the majority of the fantastic claims being made daily by people trolling for funds from the uninformed. Scientifically the study of the structure of the vacuum is still a bonafide area of inquiry both in theory and experiment. Any new knowledge coming from this area could drastically affect our understanding of not only the vacuum, but the interactions that propagate through it.


    Yes, but; and by the way Wow! (Score: 1)
    by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, September 04, 2003 @ 18:15:43 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com

    Was this poll atteched to an article as a way of showing off? Very cool. Maybe I can get a poll about that ...

    Certainly there is serious professional work on ZPE, and the people who are doing it are not confused by the quackery. And it can be said about almost *any* science these days that the layman is hard pressed to find accessible resources that are not filled with oversimplification, boosterism, hype, hyperbole, and sometimes even outright misconduct. The science journalists are part of the problem, but not all of it.

    But QT is just an inaccessible topic and so it's more poisoned than most science journalism with new-age quackery, the ZP being about the worst.


     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.