In 1998 Rabbi Shlomo Riskin had defined what the designation “crackpot” means when it is applied to a theorists, saying the following: “When you’re one step ahead of the crowd you’re a genius. When you’re two steps ahead, you’re a crackpot.”

Not just a conceptualist, but also a modern day detective as Tom takes us in baby steps through the process that allows inventors such as John Kanzius to condition the vacuum, which enables him to burn water. Even reversing human afflictions, such as cancer, can be possible.

These and more is covered in this video, Part 36 of Energy From The Vacuum™ Science Series.

By what Tom calls precursor engineering, the process of engineering physical reality itself can be actualized, and one of the most important keys is the influence of negative energy on what he calls the hierarchy of probabilities, as ordered energy grows to certainty in the observable state.

The puzzle of the proton radius

Helen Margolis, an optics physicist at the National Physical Laboratory in the UK, remarked in a column for Science magazine last year: “If the results of [further] experiments turn out to reinforce the proton size puzzle, then it could become necessary to question the foundations of the world’s most precise and best-tested fundamental physical theory, QED itself.”

A- Spherical shape – when the quantity of prótons Z is the same of the quantity of neutrons N, Z=N.

B- Elispoidal shape – when Z very smaller than  N .

But experiments have shown that some even-even nuclei with Z<< N are pear shaped.

Then, how to justify it? After all, they would have to have an ellipsoidal shape.

Hundred years from now it will be obvious how deep it was/is the creativity crisis and productivity crisis of the contemporary theoretical physics and actually how easy it was to radically change the situation. It will be also seen then in which extent the very bold ideas of Dr. Stoyan Sarg presented in his papers, lectures and his 3 books have contributed directly or have inspired the radical paradigm change to come. The theory is too high level for a technologist like me but I am very impressed by its boldness and consistency.