ZPEnergy.com - Magnet Conditioning (and more)

dtb1000 writes: Copied from KeelyNet
Hola Joe et al!
--------------
Joe Ross wrote:

Hi Jerry--Thank you for a fascinating website and getting us to think a little differently about this stuff.. I have been researching the Sweet device, and conditioning the magnet seems to be both the key and the biggest hurdle to easily producing the VTA.

Wondering if it would be possible to use POWDERED barium-ferrite instead of a finished magnet, and simply compress the powder to the desired "spacing" (between paricles) in an aluminum container. I have no idea what frequency it would run at, but perhaps a frequency sweep could determine if this approach might be viable. This might be more rugged than the conditioned magnets as well.

If you could get this idea to the appropriate people, I would be most grateful. I would really love to be able to experiment with or build one of these!!

Thanks!
Joe Ross
Tunnel Hill, GA
---------------

Yes, there have been several suggestions about shaping magnets and such, using epoxy and compressing barium ferrite and/or other materials, usually to 'shape' the magnetic field....

There has also been a lot of discussion and theories about the Sweet device, and at one time a fellow had a site which described HOW to condition your own magnets to form one or more bubbles in a slab barium ferrite magnet. I did a search on the discussion list for VTA looking to see if that website might still be out there somewhere and found some 'relevant' posts that you might find of use;

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/1135/vta.htm
http://escribe.com/science/keelynet/m9976.html
http://escribe.com/science/keelynet/m9374.html
http://escribe.com/science/keelynet/m9382.html
http://escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8882.html
http://escribe.com/science/keelynet/m6980.html

It sounds difficult to believe but I have seen and handled such a programmed magnet and it is amazing to look through magnetic viewing paper to see the bubble(s) and how you can move it across the SOLID magnet as if it were a bubble of air riding on water between the cellophane (Saran wrap) material and the water surface.

The guy who had done this was Donny Watson from the Dallas area...he said if you drop or strike the magnet it would LOSE the programmed bubble BUT it could be easily reprogrammed.

Donny said he was able to produce excess energy but he did not demonstrate this at the INE conference nor did he show me such a proof at his shed lab attached to the side of his mothers house.

Last time I saw Donny was about 5 years ago, he was working as a web designer for a small company in downtown Dallas and we went out for lunch a couple of times. Haven't heard from him in quite a while so don't know if he has pursued the Sweet work, other projects or gotten caught up in the needs of making a living.

My take on the Sweet device has been;

1) barium ferrite 'rings' for a much longer period than other magnetic materials, therefore, for a trigger/exciter signal that would dampen quickly on regular magnets, for barium ferrite it would continue to ringfor minutes longer, thus possibly helping to achieve overunity

2) the conditioning process creates a magnetic bubble which is susceptible to weak stimulus and when it dithers in and out of the Bloch wall, it induces current flow in nearby coils, said to be 'bifilar' coils where you have no back emf

3) and that by optimizing the transitions of the magnetic bubble to the intensity of the excitation signal, you can push this bubble just past the edge of the Bloch wall, sufficient to cause the flip which induces current flow and being an AC excitation signal it would push and pull to keep a stream of induced currents flowing in the conductor (coil)

With the remote chance that you don't know about Bloch walls, check out these URLs;

http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~bauer/habil_online/node23.html
http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn404/idn404.htm
http://ascension2000.com/Shift-of-the-Ages/shift13.htm
http://www.fys.uio.no/super/results/sv/

The Sweet device lways sounded like my sci-fi idea of a 'perpetual battery' which would, in the future be placed in EVERY appliance and convert aether/zpe/space energy to sufficient electrical power to operate the appliance anywhere in the world WITHOUT needing any outside wires or source of power. The claim as I recall it for the maximum power converted with the Sweet device was 1200 watts before strangeness came into play.

There was a guy a few years ago who told me he had a solid state circuit which could be scaled up or down to any size as needed....he and his partner wanted to make 30 Watt computer batteries that once triggered with the same power as would be used, would continue to produce that power on its own.

It was fascinating to me his requirement that the device must be STRUCK or ENERGIZED at the maximum full power level you intended to extract....though you could convert whatever level you wanted WITHIN the maximum. If you wanted 1000 watts, you have to 'kick-start' the device with 1000 watts after which, with a load attached, it would continue to operate on its own, without any outside source of power, only ambient aether/zpe/space energy conversion!!!

I asked him if he were to give me or anyone else the circuit, where I bought the parts and built it, would my unit work, possibly with the need for some tuning....he said NO.....why, I asked him...he said because their circuit had parameters which were balanced in some kind of harmonious self-feeding pattern....and because of that, every component in the circuit MUST fall within very specific operating parameters.

And that is why KeelyNet has long sought out and posted information relating to chaos, adaptive circuits and self-organizing behavior....seemingly unrelated to alt science but I think they are in fact critical keys which will allow us to make harmonized units...tuned as it were, that will overdrive THEMSELVES to the extent we can extract useful mechanical force or electrical energy from them....ergo...overunity...

Meaning, despite what specs SAY for transistors, caps, resistors, etc...tolerances, gain, beta, etc...if you were to take a handful of say 50 2N3904 or 2N3055 transistors and measure them seeking the idealized parameter they had discovered, you MIGHT get 1 transistor out of 50 that would fit the bill and have parameters which would fall within their idealized window of operation, it was just that picky.

He was the guy who referred originally to the term and use of a 'perpetual battery' which I think is such a wonderful GOAL to seek.

Now, it seems to me, this business of 'negative resistance' is something that could be looked for as it SHOULD gain power rather than dissipate it....some press about such matters over the last 2-3 years but nothing so far that I have seen to show overunity..

However, thinking along lines of music, heterodyning, phase conjugation, I CAN SEE how a circuit might be 'tuned' with optimized selected parts which worked in a HARMONIC FASHION to blend and increase power.

In Sweets case, you might want to look at the Gary motor from around 1880 as he too had a dithering technique where he claims there is a kind of shell that surrounds magnets which causes a flip with the tiniest ofphysical movement. He claimed to have built self-running mechanical devices which many others saw during his day and even published his plans....in later life he claimed to have adapted this to produce electrical energy by addition of coils.

I think Sweet discovered something very similar and was just nudging the bubble back and forth across the Bloch wall, causing the polarity transitions which induce current when the field flips....some might say flipping the Bloch wall itself...but to me, that is nonsensical because it is the BUBBLE that moves...

For sure, read about the Gary motor at;

http://www.keelynet.com/energy/gary.htm
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/4810/

Thanks for bringing this up....Sweets VTA claims remain quite fascinating though to date, like SO MANY OTHERS making such wonderful claims, where are the working devices and replications?

We have only bits and pieces....we need one big concerted effort with some very bright people working in a single facility to tie this mess down to something REAL...order out of chaos....nos vemos (seeya!)

--
Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com