
Response to query from major power company
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 @ 21:20:45 UTC Topic: Investors
From Tom Bearden's recent correspondence:
Subject: More info please
Hi Marcia,
The presentation implies that lab tests have been successfully conducted and widely replicated. If so, the technology should be pursued with the considerable discretionary resources available to most governments, including ours. I've been in the energy business for 30 years, never heard of your organization or Mr. Beardon. I am aware of the quantum arguments and Tesla's ideas (and many others, such as Mr. Randall Mills' hydrogen model). In principle, I'm sold on on your somewhat Hawkingesque approach.
I guess what I'm asking for is a more compelling argument that you are on to something. We have to decide on the disposition of several billion dollars in the near term, perhaps your technology might fit in somewhere.
Thanks,
XXXXXXXXX
Policy Advisor
Energy
Subject: RE: More info please - XXXXXXXXXX Ministry of Energy
Dear Mr. S********
I'm very pleased at your response, interest, and open-mindedness; of course the proper scientific attitude is to be skeptical but also open-minded and reasonable. That is the attitude you've taken, and it is very much appreciated. One does not squander taxpayer funds on chasing butterflies, if one is a responsible government official! That fact is also appreciated.
I'll give you a small technical summary and background, and then pass this to our CEO, Dr. Lee Kenny for further response, since Dr. Kenny handles all matters on the MEG. He will need your contact particulars, so he can contact you or your office directly....[Tom Bearden]
You can read the whole letter at: More Info
|
|