ZPEnergy.com - March/April 2007 Information on SuperMag, PM Rotary Devices, Energy "Good N

Modernsteam writes: It appears that SuperVision is still proceeding apace with development of its SuperMag 10-Kw magnet-based electrical generator. Steorn of Dublin, MPI of California, D2Fusion, BlackLight Power of New Jersey, and other over-unity technology developers should take notice. However, Steorn has said that its "Orbo" system, now under evaluation by "Third Party" scientists and engineers, should have its initial testing completed by December of this year, at which time the test results would be published. Rumour has it on one of the blogs, though, that Steorn is planning to demonstrate one of their devices this July. SuperVision said it expects the SuperMag machine to be demonstrated in California "soon", before thousands of scientists, engineers, and potential investors.

The SuperMag seems tentatively to be very credible, because a SuperMag artificial heart derivative has been "installed" in a patient in Montreal, and there has not been an announcement that it has failed. SuperVision, the device's parent, also has an excellent money-making record with Video-on-Demand and other electronic entertainment products.

I report with a fair amount of enthusiasm on developments with SuperMag or any other Free Energy device which claims significant progress. That does not mean I hold claims, such as those above, as necessarily true. I'm "on the fence" until I at least receive information from a reliable source, such as a conservative, "down-to-Earth" newspaper (if there are any left), or witnessing scientists/engineers skeptical and knowledgeable enough to know how to check for fraud and hoaxes, that a device has operated self-running under a hefty load for a length of time sufficient to dispell any suspicion that less total energy has been output from a system than the operator or feedback mechanism has input.

SuperVision began its latest series of announcements with this item for March 26:

http://money.excite.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_ge.jsp?news_id=iwr-0230615&feed=iwr&date=20070326

Here's the April 2 announcement of its 20 mill. candlepower breakthrough:

http://money.excite.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_ge.jsp?news_id=iwr-0233649&feed=iwr&date=20070402

I'm still a reason-based Free Energy "true believer", but have, for the time-being, become quite skeptical of pure permanent-magnet type rotary devices based only on the geometrical arrangements of permanent magnets. I tentatively accept the conclusions of certain of the more open-minded scientists/engineers who have noted that the best of these machines rotate in an apparent self-running manner - the best-known being those of Newman, Muller, and Adams - only to slow down under load after a time, because, I believe, the permanent magnets have gradually given up their coherent electron spin to the opposing load - Newton's Third Law of Motion:Action/Reaction - and lose their magnetism over time. I believe that in such "pure" cases, P-M fields are not being manipulated or interacted with each other to extract energy from the vacuum, as in the SuperMag, the Orbo, and MPI's Magnetic Power Modules, and the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics apply, as they do most of the time: Energy is Conserved, and is dissipated through entropy. It takes work to magnetize material by aligning magnetic domains and effecting same-direction electron spin. If we consider such coherent spinning electrons as nano-scale "flywheels" which can power a load at a distance, rather than through contact, we can understand that the most we'd extract for work would be the total amount of energy used to magnetize the material, minus losses through heat, friction etc. In such a "simple" case, permanent magnetic energy in a magnetic field, is depleted when used to do work, or wasted as losses.

Less I depress my fellow F-E enthusiasts too much, the good news, as I see it, is that permanent magnet fields don't have to do much work to bring forth more energy than the operator inputs. To use Tom Bearden's term, "rigourously", these fields can act just as tools. They'd not themselves be working a load, giving up their uni-directional electron spins to randomization under load stress. Instead, I understand the fields of two or more magnets can be manipulated by interacting one field relative to the other, - could we say an extension of Farady's *changing* a magnetic field relative to a conductor, - sometimes to get a "beat" frequency like two out-of-tune piano or guitar strings, or simply to "jolt" a local piece of energetic vacuum (space) though astute pulsing by engineering pulse amplitude, width, rest time between pulses, and pulse shape (Have I missed any parameters?). If done right - and this is where the intellectual property aspect comes in - the end result would be to "grab" some virtual electrons, positrons, photons, other "virtual" particles, or some of the Heavyside vectored magnetic field onto a "cross-section" of electric or magnetic charges, increasing the potential or voltage of these charges, or magnetic field strength, and into a magnetic or electric circuit, to do work on a load. There'd be enough excess to feed back to the front of the system to continue the pulsing or magnetic field interaction - ie., self-powering!

On the matter of potential or voltage, I'd hope every person, especially young people, interested in engineering physics, would ask this:"With a step-up Stanley-type transformer, notwithstanding that current is reduced and energy out equals energy in minus losses, why does an increased number of turns in the output coil result in increased voltage, and given that, where did the increased voltage come from?"

Hal Ade.