advisor7 writes: There are two basic reasons for the mysteries in the
standard model of the universe – and they are due to two wrong assumptions that
should be corrected in order to really understand our universe.
The first wrong fundamental assumption about our universe is
that Newton’s laws and gravitational constant (only derived from observations
in our solar system) are also valid at galactic distances outside our solar
system.
The second wrong fundamental assumption is that the observed
red shifts of stars show that the stars are receding and that the universe is
expanding.
EXTENDED
GRAVITY AND DARK MATTER
The first
wrong assumption is the implicit belief that Newton’s law of gravity is also
valid at cosmic distances. There are no observational proofs for this
assumption. In fact when used together with early observations of the motion of
groups of galaxies (reported by F. Zwicki), and the motion of stars in spiral
galaxies (by V. Rubin), these observations according to Newton’s laws need
massive amounts of missing matter, now called Dark Matter, to explain the many
observations.
The
equations describing the rotation of the stars in spiral galaxies, balancing
the gravitational and centrifugal force, result in M*G = r*v*v where M is the
central force and G is Newton’s gravitational constant.
In regions
where the rotation velocity curves are flat (constant) this requires that
either M increases linearly with distance r, or that G increases linearly with
distance in the region of constant rotation velocity. The usual assumption is
that a linear invisible mass is the explanation for the unusual observations
thus leading to a need for massive amounts of dark matter.
Actually my
simple extension of the gravitational constant G consisting of an additional
term linear in distance, A*r, can explain the observations without needing to
search for dark matter. (This is different from the interesting MOND theory of
M. Milgrom that involves acceleration.) Note that with this extension of the gravitational
constant with large distances, Newton’s laws and Einstein’s General Relativity
are still valid in our solar system at the smaller distances. The observed
gravitational lenses are also explained without needing dark matter.
TRUE MEANING
OF THE RED SHIFT
The second,
and more critical, wrong assumption is that the observed red shifts are only
due to the Doppler effect and presumably show that the stars with red shifts
are receding.
This wrong
assumption concerning the causes and meaning of the red shift has resulted in a
number of even more serious errors, including the apparent expansion of the
universe, the supposed initial inflation, the apparent acceleration of the
expansion, and the need for Dark Energy, the wrong age of the universe based
upon the Hubble constant, the big bang, Inflation, and the explanation for the
Cosmic Microwave Background and its low temperature. A number of Nobel prizes
were awarded based upon excellent works that unfortunately were based upon
these wrong assumptions.
The red
shift initially termed by Hubble as an “… apparent Doppler effect …” is
supposed to measure the apparent receding velocity of remote stars, leading to
the conclusion that the universe is expanding. This apparent expansion
encouraged Einstein to remove his cosmological constant, which he previously
had inserted into his equations to support his belief (wish) for a static
universe.
Actually,
there are three additional contributions to the red shift and they are only due
to gravity. The first is for photons leaving large masses. The results are that
massive quasars can appear to have large energy output, and transverse
(angular, “proper”) velocities greater than the velocity of light. This is
because the apparently large distances determined from the red shift make the
quasars appear to be further away. This also explains why galaxies that appear
to be connected by streams of stars (H. Arp) also show different red shifts
indicating large differences in distance (a massive black hole in the further
galaxy adding to the red shift).
The second
contribution to the red shift is for photons traveling large interstellar
distances and is due to gravitational drag by interstellar dust and gas
(without collisions or absorption and reemission that would blur images). This
is similar to the gravitational drag by our moon on Earth tides causing the
moon to lose energy, without needing blurring effects on the photons.
The third
contribution is due to the long-range drag by the extended gravitational
constant (related to the apparent dark matter), and adds a new logarithmic
term, ln(r) as a contribution to the red shift. The logarithmic term arises
from the integration of the force with the inverse r term in the extended
gravitational constant with respect to distance to determine the loss of photon
energy.
The apparent
accelerating expansion of the universe is due to the observations that very
remote stars are dimmer (and further away) than predicted from their observed
red shifts based upon the Hubble linear relation ship between red shift and
distance (S. Perlmutter). The result is the apparent need for Dark Energy to
power the acceleration.
For very
remote stars, determination of distance from red shift and the Hubble constant
is no longer linear and should be corrected by the ln(r) contribution for the
extreme distances (based upon the integration over distance of the 1/r term in
the force described by the extended gravitational constant). This error makes
the distance for very remote stars based upon intensity much larger than
expected from the assumed linear red shift. The wrong interpretation of
distance based upon observed red shifts and distances of very remote stars
resulted in the wrong concepts of accelerating expansion, and dark energy to
provide the reason for the differences between red shift distance and the light
intensity determination.
The cosmic
microwave background is caused by the effect of gravity on photons traveling
long distances to reduce the photon energy to the microwave range. Gravitational
interactions will equilibrate the microwave photon energy to thermal
equilibrium with the very low (2.7 K) temperature of interstellar gas and dust.
Others have previously calculated the temperature of interstellar space to be
in the very low Kelvin range.
The loss of
photon energy traveling from very remote stars will shift the wavelength out of
the visible range – and this explains Olbers paradox (why the sky is black in
spite of the vast number of stars). Further travel will shift the photon energy
to the microwave range.
SUMMARY
There is no
need to search for dark matter. It is just the result of a wrong assumption.
There is no
valid proof that the universe is expanding. This belief is the result of the
assumption that the red shift is due to the Doppler effect.
A careful,
open minded review of the points raised here could be beneficial to the future
progress of the scientific community although the results could be upsetting to
many intelligent and productive experts working in this field. The standard
model of the universe has too many assumptions to be true. Remember, according
to the razor of William of Ockham, simple solutions are preferred.
Sol Aisenberg, Ph.D.
Natick,
MA 01760
U.S.A.
508/651-0140
itgplus@earthlink.net
http://inventing-solutions.com