|
There are currently, 176 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
New Electrical Current Patent
Posted on Saturday, June 10, 2006 @ 19:10:48 GMT by vlad
|
|
Anonymous writes: Clear Energy, Inc., a small R&D company in Baltimore, Maryland has
been issued US Patent number 7,041,203 for a new electrical current. It
has been over 100 years since the last patented electrical current was
issued by the US Patent Office for Alternating Current (AC).
Previously, there were two types of currents used to deliver electrical
power. Direct Current (DC) that comes from your battery in your
automobile discovered by Ben Franklin in the 1700’s and Alternating
Current (AC) that was discovered by Nikola Tesla and is used to power
your home.
Clear Energy, Inc., a small R&D company in Baltimore, Maryland has been issued US Patent number 7,041,203 for a new electrical current. It has been over 100 years since the last patented electrical current was issued by the US Patent Office for Alternating Current (AC).
Previously, there were two types of currents used to deliver electrical power. Direct Current (DC) that comes from your battery in your automobile discovered by Ben Franklin in the 1700’s and Alternating Current (AC) that was discovered by Nikola Tesla and is used to power your home.
Alternating current (AC) is described as electric current that flows for an interval of time in one direction and then in the opposite direction; that is, a current that flows in alternately reversed directions through or around a circuit. The polarities of electrodes or conductors are constantly swapping polarities when the current changes direction.
Direct current (DC) is described as electrical current that flows in one direction, and does not reverse its polarities as alternating current does. The electricity produced in (DC) batteries is direct current. The Plus (+) and Minus (-) polarities of electrodes remain constant and never swap.
But, what would happen if you have a polarity reversal within the (+) positive and (-) negative electrode without swapping the polarity of the supply voltage. The result is a new electrical current called Sully Direct Current or (SDC)™ named after its inventor John T. Sullivan.
Sully Direct Current (SDC) ™ is described as electrical current that flows for an interval of time in one direction and then in the opposite direction; that is, two or more current paths flowing in alternately reversed directions within a constant (+) Anode and (-)Cathode circuit. The plus (+) and minus (-) supply polarities of electrodes remain constant same as a (DC) battery, the polarities within the electrodes of the circuit are reversing causing an alternating reversing multi-directional currents. Alternating Current (AC) and (SDC) ™ both have current reversal, (AC) changes (+) anode and (-) cathode supply polarity when it changes current direction (SDC) ™ changes current direction without swapping the (+) anode and (-) cathode supply lines. Sully Direct Current (SDC)™ can reverse currents at full voltage or zero volts to produce tuned counter EMF forces and magnetic field reversals.
The Voltage across the Anode (+) and cathode (-) is measured with a (DC) Volt meter, the current between two or more circuits or cells is measured with an (AC) current meter that can be measured in (Sully Watts)™ .
Mr. Sullivan created SDC™ while working on one of his patented hydrogen and oxygen electrolysis generators to create an alternative fuel. One limiting factor in efficient creation of hydrogen in electrolysis is the attraction created between Hydrogen and Oxygen gas bubbles to electrodes, “they stick like tiny magnets increasing resistance of electrodes” thus reducing gas production. As the SDC current changes direction within an inductive coil, the directions of the magnetic fields reverse creating multidirectional forces on the electrodes and ions. A tuned resonator circuit can creates vibrations on the electrodes; this action shakes the electrodes and significantly increases the release of the hydrogen bubbles resulting in more efficient production of pure Hydrogen and Oxygen. It would not be feasible to use (AC) to create this mechanical action; the gases would mix as polarities are swapped creating an unstable mixed gas. The illustration below explains how SDC™ works. Studies are just beginning to develop new applications for this revolutionary new voltage in many disciplines such as lighting, semi-conductors, capacitors, gravity experiments, fusion, particle accelerators, motors, hydrogen generators, fuel cells, batteries, water purifiers and medical applications.
The Inventor is hoping that SDC™ currents will open new doors to scientific discoveries and products that were not possible with (AC) and (DC). www.sullyDC.com
Patent pending all rights reserved. Patent numbers 6,890,410, 7,041,203 “SDC” and “Sully Volts” “Sully Watts” are a registered Trade Marks of Sullivan Industries, Inc. © 2006
Link: http://www.sullydc.com/pressrelease.html
|
| |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 2.57 Votes: 7
| |
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by pulsed_ignition on Sunday, June 11, 2006 @ 19:16:37 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) http://diamondlube.com | On 15 Nov 2004, Mr Sullivan was notified that HE did not invent whatever it is he is claiming and he was so kind as to reference my patent. What is laughable is what he now calls the Sully Current and "efficient plasma generation" which is what I have been trying to explain since 1999.
Sullivan, nice copy of my patent, and I may just have both of your patents reviewed by the USPTO.
Chris Arnold |
|
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by writerofwrongs on Tuesday, June 20, 2006 @ 00:12:41 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) | Here is his "amazing invention" with all the obfuscations and spurious components removed:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/zooboo/SULLYBS2.gif
He's scouring the web for forums to post his lies in, and whenever he gets cornered he just changes schematics and goes to a new board and starts over from the beginning.
He wants to make a name for himself? Good here it is: "Slippery Sullivan"
BTW this board is crap, you can't post under Opera, and you can't post links with Firefox via copy & paste, it simply does not work. I guess we're all expected to conform and use microsoft internet explorer, or should I call it "ScullyIE" lol
|
|
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by pulsed_ignition on Tuesday, June 20, 2006 @ 17:25:25 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) http://diamondlube.com | Sullivan,
I "WILL" spend the $2500 and have your infringing patent reviewed - after you invest a load of money on prototyping and seeking investors. It is apparent you have followed my posts closely enough to mention most of my ideas on fuel reformation stemming from 2000 (and DOE 2002 & 2003 Hydrogen generation grant applications), and the device being a pulsed plasma particle accelerator, producing atomic fusion, Hydrogen, use as a motor, applications in semiconductors, water purification and medical applications.
I shall vigorously protect my patent rights, and when I am done with you - you will never forget what I do to people that so blatantly rip me off and attempt to call my discoveries - their own. Each time I see "application abandoned" on people trying to copy my breakthrough Plasma Patent - I feel a sense of personal accomplishment in handling the entire action pro-se, but when I prove point by point that you simply copied all of my prior art and have your patent yanked from your idiot hands - see how smart you feel then.
Many of you here just think my ideas are crazy, not knowing that I have already proven them to be true.
Chris Arnold |
|
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by ArchAngel on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 @ 16:31:33 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) | Chris Arnold:
Could you please supply a patent number, and any links to information on your patent?
Thank you.... |
|
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by ArchAngel on Sunday, June 25, 2006 @ 12:06:12 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) | Chris Arnold:
You said "Many of you here just think my ideas are crazy, not knowing that I have already proven them to be true". Could you please show us where you did this? I would like to see it. Searching Google led me nowhere.
You also said that Mr. Sullivan stole your idea. I looked at your patent to see what you were implying, and did not see the SDC system being used. Would you be so kind as to show us where the interpolar switching is?
I also noticed that your patent was up for sale for a hundred million, yet you still refer to it as your patent. If you didn't sell it what was the highest bid, and is it still up for sale?
I would like to understand what is unique about your system, and would love to see proof of negative entropy.
If its real you are the modern messiah, if not maybe the ones who think you are crazy are correct... |
|
|
Re: New Electrical Current Patent (Score: 1) by pulsed_ignition on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 @ 15:33:39 GMT (User Info | Send a Message) http://diamondlube.com | To suggest that I would be the messiah if the device worked is fanatical, but the device does work, as well as tap the field - and I am not the messiah.
Many people may think I am crazy for claiming such a device is real, yet just as many cannot think - so I will not take it personally.
Chris |
|
|
|
|