Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 94 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science


Energy Science



Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs


New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

170 kwh/day, 1.2 kw at a time (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, April 22, 2003 @ 17:46:42 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
The eCells are (approx) 0.6 watt fuel cells. How are two of them supposed to make any more than 30 kwh in one day? I do wonder why they changed the units. Just for contrast, that same paragraph used to be in the "Market Ready" paragraph of the Technology section.

The Genesis Project has developed two market ready models of the Edison Device: a residential version and a commercial version. The residential model is capable of producing up to 30 total kilowatts of combined gas and electrical power per day (a typical home uses between five to six kilowatts), and the commercial model can generate up to 100 total kilowatts of energy. For heavier commercial requirements, multiple Edison Devices can be linked together.

| Parent

Re: GWE changes wording on Edison device to Kilowatt hours (Score: 1)
by RedPill on Wednesday, April 23, 2003 @ 08:24:57 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Why couldn't it be 170 Kw a day divided by 24 hours, this would give you an average of 7Kw per hour.

Im not an electrician and dont claim to know practically anything about measuring power but if the statement was "a day" then why not just device that number across 24 hours?

| Parent

GWE numerolgy (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, April 23, 2003 @ 21:52:07 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
It seems that Genesis World Energy is recycling the same few numbers and changing what they are supposed to stand for. Consider the table below.

oldtech: shows how that number was used in the original technology tab
pressrel: how the Newsroom, original press release uses number
newpag: how new "Edison Device" description uses number

Number 5
oldtech: Claimed average household natural gas usage, in cu ft / day
pressrel: nothing
newpage: Same as oldtech

Number 6
oldtech: Claimed average home power usage in kw per day
pressrel: Claimed average home energy usage in kw per day
newpag: Hidden. Has morphed to 7.2.

Number 30
oldtech: Total power of consumer Edison, in kw per day
pressrel: Total energy of consumer Edison, in kw per day
newpag: See 720. Also, H2 output of consumer Edison, in cubic feet / day

Number 100
oldtech: Commercial Edison's enbergy production in kw / day
pressrel: Same
newpag: Claimed cap for a typical home's averag electricity usage, in khw/day
.............Also Commercial Edison's H2 output in cu ft /day

Number 170 newpage only: Consumer Edison's energy output, in kwh/day
Number 720 newpage only: Commercial edison's energy output, in kwh (?per day?) 24X30

Enjoy the table, mix and match the numbers and have fun. Try to find find how the 6 kw of power per day transformed into 170 kwh of energy per day. Hint, why does the eCell have only 0.5 volts under load, isn't that substandard? What's standard? What mistake did they make to get to 0.5?

For the original technology page, see the snapshot saved at blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/voodoo.pdf.

| Parent


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.