Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 395 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Spin waves and the ZPE (Score: 1) by vlad on Wednesday, May 28, 2003 @ 02:01:54 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com Don, what good will do to you to know who were the witnesses? Those who accepted to make their names known such as Tom Bearden, John Bedini, Mike Watson, Walter Rosenthal etc., are probably already categorized unreliable by you (in my opinion this is an insult many skeptics resort to so easily). Even if you don’t call them liars (there must have been a conspiracy obviously) then you would tell us they were all wrong. But these are physicist, engineers, etc., qualified people quite able to examine such a device first hand, and …most of all, at COP > 1,500,000, input/output energy measurements errors are hardly an issue. Consequently, there is only one option left for a skeptic: Sparky was a con artist capable to fool all these honest and qualified people for years. If this is your opinion, our discussion must end here because both of us are wasting our time, and I can’t afford it. The only other alternative that most of us here believe in is: this was indeed the "most elegant and most desirable of all ZPE tapping energy machines” (see other posts on this site about it – use search). | Parent Re: Spin waves and the ZPE by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 28, 2003 @ 15:27:55 UTC witness vs verify by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, May 29, 2003 @ 02:02:43 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.