Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 264 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Re: Re: MPI - Executive Summary updated (Score: 1) by mach946 on Thursday, August 31, 2006 @ 14:04:00 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) MPI, Bearden, Steorn, Bedinni, ETC will all fail as long as they try and secure a patent in the OIL BASED countries, i.e. USA, Britain, Russia, etc. The USA for example has a law that enables them to put a gag order on any disruptive technology for fifty years. When I say disruptive IM talking about financial. These countries generate a huge amount of revenue via taxation that supports government programs from Military, public schools, medicare, social security, etc etc. Now if these inventors are that naive to believe that these government institutions will stand by and let them supplant oil with a technology that cant be taxed they are crazy. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. That is what all these inventors have been doing, thus there true reason for failing. You cannot try to implement technology of this nature in countries already established in centralized ways of producing energy! It wont work. They have to go to countries that dont have a vested interest in centralized energy. Until they get that simple concept in theire heads, they will continue to have perpetual time lines and excuses for not being able to mass produce thes inventions. MPI will fail because they do not realize that our government is the biggest mafia on the planet. | Parent Re: MPI Executive Summary, energy taxation by modernsteam on Thursday, August 31, 2006 @ 17:21:39 UTC Re: Re: MPI Executive Summary, energy taxation by mach946 on Thursday, August 31, 2006 @ 18:41:05 UTC Re: Re: Re: MPI - Executive Summary updated (Score: 1) by seanu on Friday, September 08, 2006 @ 04:51:21 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Intellectual proprty laws amount to nothing when the individual is concerned.  If this technology taps into an existsing energy source (which it must do) then the only thing that can be patented is the mechanism to extract said energy.  I know of no law that prohibits the reverse engineering of a product for ones own private study and use.  All laws are designed to protect the exploitation of a market by giving the patent holder license to exploit the mechanism for 20 years. Two interesting things can happen when MPI, Steorn etc release their products for sale. 1) People can and will reverse engineer the technology to understand the underlying principles of their magic machines and thus the mechanism will be understood, theories built upon it and new mechanisms made to perform the same function. 2) being that they are tapping into an energy source, MPI et al might be able to apply for an extraction license in every country, thereby privatising the energy source and illegalising legitimate private individuals who make their own energy tapping mechanisms based on (1). With ill-educated goveners, as techmac suggests, (2) above might be a possibility if the goveners believe the mechanisms for extracting energy actually creates energy; in effect through the patent process MPI could gain a monopoly on all "free-energy" (or energy-transducer) devices. | Parent Re: MPI - a monopoly is not possible! by Overtone on Friday, September 08, 2006 @ 07:55:45 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.