ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 299 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Why Ultraconductors are not yet in use (Score: 1)
    by aironoeus on Sunday, September 18, 2005 @ 07:30:36 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Small bussiness! Where's the product?
    You need to put a product on the market. You're not real to them because you don't have a product on the market. What practical thing can they point to as representative of the usefulness of ultraconductors. You and I and everyone here might appreciate the tech and think of you as an R&D company but all them big players don't see you as real until you get something practical on the market. You're falling out of the R&D category and landing in the Manufacturer category by default. A manufacturer that is not manufacturing anything and so doesn't represent anything. They are not going to take you seriously until you are in the position where you don't necessarily need them. You might as well be standing there with silver wire in your hands, that's probably the sort of concept they have of you. There is no REAL PRODUCT ON THE MARKET TO GET THEIR ATTENTION.
    Pick something simple and make it better and stick it on the market. You have to suffer through all those things that a small manufacturer suffers through. You have to start on the bottom.

    What's the difference between that former NASA guy that tried to get the brilliant P32 slalom into production
    http://www.rqriley.com/tech-ov.htm

    and this guy named David Corbin that slapped together "The Sparrow?"
    http://www.myersmotors.com/sparrowbuy.html

    The first guy ran around like a chicken with his head cut off saying, "I need investors, nobody will invest for fear of liability risk"

    and the second guy skipped all that need of approval from others and just put a product on the market. Apparently it wasn't all that good but he just put it there. He started making them.
    What are the chances - you think - that eventually the sparrow is going to end up closely resembling the P32 slalom? Pretty darn good I think. Why? Because it's real. It's there. It's representing that particular niche in the US.

    And you know, the guys that bought out Corbin and took it over are in need of a good low power thermoelectric air conditioner for that thing since they are revamping it.

    If you really need an invitation here it is.

    http://www.myersmotors.com/August2005.htm
    (scroll to bottom of page)





    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.