Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 309 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: DOES ZPE NEED A DIFFERENTIAL TO WORK? (Score: 1) by Gewis on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 @ 23:10:12 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Potential means just that: potential. At a meter above the ground, there is a potential, the possibility that the force of gravity acting on it will give it x joules of energy. What we call zero isn't important here... only differences matter. A brick two meters off the ground compared to a brick one meter off the ground can reliably said to have x amount more potential energy than the lower brick. However, it's always comparative. If there's a possibility (that's exactly what potential means) the brick could have even more kinetic energy by falling further (say it's held over a 1 meter deep pit), then it might be useful to say it has x much more potential than it used to. So it's not entirely arbitrary, as it's dependent on configuration. However, you can consistently say that the potential energy of a brick, mass*gravitational.acceleration*height will turn into a certain amount of kinetic energy. If a brick falls one meter at sea level in vacuum environment, it will always hit the ground with the same kinetic energy. If you drop it from two meters, it will have twice the kinetic energy when it hits the ground. All of this is obvious, right? The really cool part about it is that potential energy is real. Nuclear potential, electrical potential, gravitational potential... it all is really there. If you have two identical stationary objects of the same mass at the same height, and then you raise one of those objects higher up, it will gain mass. E=mc^2 applies even in gravitational potential. Nuclear reactions work because nucleons are able to move to a position of lower potential energy. In D + D -> He4 + 2 gamma (2.2 MeV?), the nucleons in the helium end with a lower average potential energy than when they had in the deuterium, and the difference between their starting and ending potential energies is equal to the mass lost via the gamma rays. All energy is the same way, even gravitational potential. Anyway, if the ZPE is a true baseline, then it's going to be hard (read impossible) to get it to move from a higher potential to a lower, because it's all uniform. Except, of course, if spacetime isn't flat. Or if ZPE interactions with charged particles are the origin of spacetime curvature, or any number of different very exciting possibilities. Point is, you still have to have an energy differential to extract anything out of it. All the schemes that folks have come up with for using ZPE have relied on somehow creating a perturbation via magnetics or otherwise that cause a flow, a movement from higher to lower potential. | Parent Re: DOES ZPE NEED A DIFFERENTIAL TO WORK? by seanu on Thursday, September 01, 2005 @ 04:03:03 UTC Re: DOES ZPE NEED A DIFFERENTIAL TO WORK? by Cold_Steel on Thursday, September 01, 2005 @ 09:04:05 UTC Re: DOES ZPE NEED A DIFFERENTIAL TO WORK? by nanotech on Friday, September 02, 2005 @ 12:36:15 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.