Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 306 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: BLP, the struggle for legitimacy (Score: 1) by vlad on Monday, March 14, 2005 @ 22:04:50 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com ElectroDynaCat, you are essentially correct, in a straightforward world; but we live in anything but a clear and simple world. Unfortunately a “good theory” is in the eyes of the beholder. Mills “thinks” he has a good theory, which serve him well to “resolve” his experiments and ensure repeatability. Nevertheless to get something done you need money/investors and “they” want insurance from the established science, despite the “empirical” evidence, as it is very well illustrated in Mike Carrell’s message below (responding to “avisho” – see original post - Vlad): MC: I'm not the mathematician here but I agree with you. Skeptics on this forum have concluded that the orbitsphere model cannot be stable using elementary analysis of the moving charges; they conclude that following steps by Mills include indefensible assumptions to get to the numbers on which the successful calculations are based, and therefore the numerical correlations you note are meaningless. Others on this forum disagree with this reasoning. Years ago, Mills' insight about the sub-quantum states led to a series of experiments with catalysts which were preselected based on the criteria given in the papers. Initially, he had no lab facilities, so these experiments were performed in industrial and university labs under his sponsorship. At least one Master's thesis used a BLP experiment as its subject. Operation of BLP current experiments have been witnessed by a team from Rowan University. Supporting experiments have been performed by Conrads in Germany and Phillips et.al. at the University of New Mexico. Papers based on these latter have been published in peer reviewed professional journals. Critics on HSG do not accept as valid any experiment performed by any associate of Mills or sponsored by Mills. By that criterion, even due diligence cooperative experimentation performed by a major corporation would be rejected on academic grounds. The ultimate test here is successful construction of a working commercial device, and replication of it in a commercial sense. Skeptics can then purchase the device and test it to their heart's content and then try to fit its performance into accepted physical theory. I suggest continued study of the experiments on the website. Some reports have been truncated as the content has been published in a professional journal and copyright control has passed to those journals. The journal references are given in each case. Mike Carrell | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.