ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 109 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Is it really THAT simple ?? (Score: 1)
by AndyC (hotmail account andydcoles) on Sunday, April 18, 2004 @ 13:17:21 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Unless ZPE device inventors also happen to be very rich, they will have to raise considerable finance to commercialize a ZPE product, and/or reveal how they did it so it can be successfully replicated. There are plenty of indications of this in the past, like Nikola Tesla, Moray, Ed Gray, Sweet and Teruo Kawai. Most of these individuals were widely reported to have demonstrated their inventions WORKING. So why do we not benefit from them now? The same thing almost happened with the Wright brothers - hundreds of local people witnessed their early flights, but it was years before these 'backwoods tinkerers' were taken seriously. The scientists of the day were adamant that it was impossible (ring any bells?). Heavier-than-air powered flight was eventually accepted, and deemed even beneficial to mankind. Perhaps we have the First World War to thank for the hasty development of flight. If the sceptics amongst ZPEnergy readers want evidence, take a look at Dr. Steven Greer's Disclosure Project. OK, no one has been able to show a piece of an alien spacecraft (to my knowledge), but witnesses have independently corroborated each others testimony. For example, pilots and air traffic controllers viewing the same craft. I bought the DVD of evidence. It was compelling for me, but then I'm only a post-graduate Software Engineer, so what do I know?


| Parent

Re: Is it really THAT simple?? Not really. (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, April 18, 2004 @ 20:11:53 EDT
The concept of a feedback loop to power something is a fluke. It is the same as the concept used in all cars today, The alternator. The alternator does help repower the battery power lost in combustion, but more energy is needed to refill the battery.

If the feedback loop could work, you would need to supply extra energy to "refill" the loop. So in essence, the feedback loop doesn't "power" itself by any means.

In any transfer of energy, even just through even 1 inch of electrical wire, it is not completely transfered. You can never have a 100% efficient system. There is always energy lost in the form of heat, light, or movement.

If it was possible to have 100% efficiency, we could probably quadruple+ feul economy, we wouldn't need power transformers on power lines, and feedback loops would be possible. This just can't happen though.

Furthermore, isn't the concept of ZPE, "free" energy? It seems to me that if you need to put energy into the device to "create" energy, how is that free? Granted (I am not all negative) this would be helpful to conserve energy, as in the case of the alternator in the car, but it is not 100% efficient or even close by any means.

I am new to Zero Point, but so far it looks very promissing in my opinion. I hope this does replace our current forms of energy because Fossil feuls won't last forever. The "discovery" of how to harness ZPE is exactly what this world needs right now.

GOOD LUCK to all.


| Parent

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.