Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 111 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science


Energy Science



Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs


New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

My last post to this thread... (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 14:57:48 EST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com
My whole reason for jumping into this discussion was to correct your mis-statement at the beginning of this thread.

You said: "The problem with GWE demonstrating the Hammacher device for investors is that they were led to believe that it was a GWE device"

This is a plain mis-statement of the truth. GWE did not demonstrate the Hammacher device, they demonstrated a proof-of-concept model that supposedly LOOKED LIKE the Hammacher device. This is clearly pointed out (again) by another poster to this thread who went back and re-read the article in question.

On one hand, I can understand your eagerness to discuss your reported trail of bummed investors and state Attorneys General as evidence of a GWE scam. Let me offer another view.

I've been hanging out in Vlad's virtual backyard here for about a year now, and I have watched you mis-report the facts in the same way I point out above many times...bending the truth to influence others to see your point of view. Given your surety of GWE's "scamability" is that really necessary? As I've said before, it really does nothing to help your case.

You know, I would probably be eager to get into such a discussion of GWE scam/investor theories with someone who is open minded and willing to look at more than their own ideas and opinions...but you are not that person.

From the beginning, you have adopted the philosophy of "Shoot first...then shoot again" towards GWE. That's OK by me, and it seems like you are having some success convincing others with your subtle bending of the truth.

But it's just because of this well-documented
"virtual vigalante" posture you have taken against GWE that I consider having a deeper discussion with you about GWE "issues" irrelevant.

Why would I waste people's time and Vlad's bandwidth on such a hopeless cause? While I attempt to stay open to your point of view, the possibility of GWE being a scam, I have yet to see any evidence that you are open to anything but your own opinions.

I am quite content to keep my mind open about this subject while quietly waiting for the eventual outcome. I will continue to read your posts and to honestly consider what you have to say, but I will not enter into a discussion with you nor will I give any creedence to your close-minded way of thinking.

And if GWE is eventually proven to be a clever scam as you have so persistently claimed, I hope to learn about it from someone other than you.

I'm finished with this thread. See you on the next one....

Onward and Upward,


| Parent


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.