Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 86 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 8, 2018 - August 12, 2018) COFE10 + TeslaTech Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science


    Energy Science



    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs


    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.




    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    Alternative Energy News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Simple Math (Score: 1)
    by mlmitton on Monday, November 10, 2003 @ 21:09:43 EST
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Has the GWE page changed since you had this exchange about their numbers? Because it seems everybody commenting here is screwing up these numbers.

    There are two costs here--The fixed cost of purchasing the device, and the operational cost. The fixed cost is $112.50 'per KwH of daily capacity.' The operational cost is 1.9 cents per KwH. So, if you have a unit producing 26.6 KwH per day, the daily operational cost will be slightly over 50 cents (26.6 * .019). So the monthly operational cost will be about 15 dollars (30 * .50). This is very simple, so please tell me the page has been cleaned up.

    The associated question is this: Give these costs, does it make financial sense to purchase the Edison Device? Or to phrase it another way, how much would electricity need to cost from my utility company so that I would be indifferent between buying an Edison device and staying with the power company.

    To do this, you need to calculate the present discounted value of the Edison Device over the next 20 years, the expected life of the device.

    Using their numbers, the $2992.50 is a cost incurred today, and the $15 cost will be incurred monthly for the next 20 years. Using the formula for an annuity, the PDV of $15 per month for 20 years, assuming a 6% annual interest rate is about $2094. So, the present discounted value of all costs for the Edison device, over the life of the device, is $5086 (2094 + 2992).

    Now, how much would you have to pay in electricity to your utility company each month, for the next 20 years, for the PDV of those payments to equal $5086. You use the same annuity formula, but solve for the monthly payment. I get about $36.50.

    So, if your average electric bill is $36.50, then you will be exactly indifferent (monetarily) between staying with the utility company and purchasing an Edison device. If your bill is more than that, then you would be better off with an Edison. If your bill is less, then you would be better off staying with your electrical company.

    Are we clear on these numbers now?

    Post-script for the interested. The discounting formula for an annuity is:

    PDV = N * D * [(1-D^n)/(1-D)]
    D = 1/ 1+i
    N = The amount paid in each period
    n = The number of periods
    i = The appropriate interest rate. Note that if you're using monthly periods, you need to convert an annual interest rate into a monthly interest rate. A 6% annual rate is a .5% monthly rate (6%/12)

    | Parent


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.