Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 71 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 8, 2018 - August 12, 2018) COFE10 + TeslaTech Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science


    Energy Science



    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs


    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.




    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    Alternative Energy News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Letís set the record straight (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 08, 2003 @ 14:43:46 EDT
    Thanks for the quick response. As I am not a shareholder I appreciate the info.

    | Parent

    Ought to write an article (Score: 1)
    by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 09, 2003 @ 01:37:15 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
    All these replies are hard to follow.

    You say you don't understand the mystery of the information presented to UFCT shareholders. Yet it's hard to reconcile your statements with GWE's. You say that UFCT has licensed technology from the inventors (whoever they are) that they are subletting to GWE. But GWE does not support that claim.

    What I see is that there is a lot of communication that's not written. Your report of the decision not to go public is a little different than what I have been told. You don't mention the decision not to have a buy back. Human memory is not so good, so we end up with inconsistent accounts. There was even a rumor in February that UFCT shares would be exchanged for GWE shares. (Yes, I know that makes no sense, since GWEP id supposed to be a partnership. But it wasn't my rumor.) What's the same from investor to investor is that Kelly sold stock in the Edison device long before GWE came around, and that he had models of the device as props for the stock sale.

    You really ought to write up your report of seeing the Edison. It's important to note what you measured, saw, were told or concluded. You saw bubbles and (?light?) from the g-cells, and concluded that they were operating as GWE states. But if you didn't have Watt meters on them, you don't know if they were externally powered. If you didn't weigh them before and after, you don't know how much they were used up (assuming a chemical reaction). What you saw and measured is more interesting than what you were told.

    You are patient. A year after buying in, all you see is the website. A year later, updates to the website. In 2004 Q1, you are not going to get a 10 cent per share dividend (or a 1 cent per share dividend). How long are you willing to wait for something other than PR from Kelly?

    | Parent


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.