Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 258 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Answering extracting vacuum energy question (Score: 1) by Koen on Sunday, December 13, 2009 @ 10:35:35 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla According to the "standard" model of physics the ZPE is the lowest energy state, etc .... But standards models are riddled with assumptions that were never proven by experiments in the first place. Many "impossibilities", that are ruled out by the "standard model", are unproven speculations. Now, Tom is not capable of pointing out the weaknesses in the standard model of physics. His defence of harvesting ZPE energy  is weak. I am afraid that Puthoff and others do not offer a real solution to Scott's argument  via the introduction of the stochastic electrodynamics model. I repeat:  this is just a model,  and predictions based on models isn't physics. The toy physics models of Jack Sarfatti  speaks of a 'false' vacuum state of 'flat land'  (a false minimum energy)  which can be lowered  (also known as curved space, gravity, also known as a symmetry breaking of the ZPE, etc ....).  Jack applies Bohm's 'micro'-physics,  so he is not tied to quantum-physics which does not describe macroscopic structures of the vacuum. Some have shown that a strong static electric field in vacuum can induce a "gravitic" effect,  and now Turtur shows an "overunity effect".  Two sides of the same coin if you ask me. The big question is:  why should a strong electric field (but not astronomical strong)  induce gravitic effects, or an overunity effect ??? Answer (??).  If you ask me, the vacuum is filled with very light particles (much lighter than electrons) that are charged, and which can be polarized (created) by a strong electric field.  Notice that electric fields over macroscopic distances for creating electrons/positron pairs are too strong (beyond  technical capability). Turtur's explanation is implausible  (electric-field enhanced Casimir forces). Since Casimir forces fall off rapidly with distance ( f ~  1/r^4 ) and Turtur's experiment shows plate distances much larger than microns,   the amplification factor of the Casimir force by means  of the strong electric field  must be huge;  a huge Kerr-birefringence  effect  is not likely. My opinion about Turtur's experiment:  it is not naive at all,  and unlikely to be explained by conventional physic nor air ionisation. Scott cannot explain the experimental results, therefore he calls Turtur naive, in order to hide his own ignorance. | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.