Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 130 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: New Energy Security Journal (Score: 1) by Koen on Thursday, December 04, 2008 @ 22:23:24 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla 1) at least my theory is testable, while many other theories are not testable. 2) there is already qualitative experimental proof for the described scalar field effects,  such as the longitudinal electric wave in vacuum (experiments by Ignatiev, Wesley&Monstein) and the longitudinal Ampere force (experiments by Ampere and others, see for instance  http://www.df.lth.se/~snorkelf/Longitudinal/Slutdok.html  ). My scalar field theory is the only classical field theory that predicts such forces and waves. A riddle: according to official theory, the electric potential 'Phi'  is 'retarded' and has the speed of the light wave,  while light waves  (transversal electro-magnetic waves)  are described only in terms of the magnetic potential 'A'.  Why is it concluded  Phi spreads with the speed of light waves, while it is not 'light waves'? Could  Phi spread with a speed much higher than c? Does it have an internal waves structure (described by Whittaker)? Fields and potentials for the transversal electro-magnetic light wave: Phi = 0          (electric potential is zero) E    = - dA/dt,    (electric field is minus the time differential of the magnetic potential) B   = rot(A)      (magnetic field is the rotation of the magnetic potential)  | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.